Work done on moving a submerged object

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on a submerged object, specifically focusing on the forces acting on it, including buoyant force and tension. The subject area includes concepts from fluid mechanics and forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of buoyant force and gravitational force, and how these relate to tension and work done. There are questions about the correctness of the approach to calculating work done by tension.

Discussion Status

Some participants express uncertainty about the calculations and whether the approach is valid. There is acknowledgment of the complexity of the problem, with one participant noting the significance of units in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the problem's scoring criteria, indicating that attention to detail, such as including units, is important in the context of a homework assignment.

Murray Inglis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A 5.00 kg air-filled, sealed, rigid float tank that has a volume of 1.00 m3
is pulled 50.4 m
down to the seafloor in order to assist in lifting a sunken object. A diver standing on the
seafloor cranks a winch to pull the tank down.
How much work is required to pull the tank down? (You may safely ignore the mass
in the air tank and the mass of the winch rope.)
Relevant Equations
Fb = p(rho)Vg
I first worked out the buoyant force using rho = 1000, g = 9.8 and V = 1. (this gives Fb = 9800)
I then worked out Fg of the tank (5 x 9.8 = 49)
Then I used Fnet = Fb - Fg - T = 0 to work out tension as 9751.
I thought the work done would be the work done by tension (9751 x 50.4), but I'm not sure if this works.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2021-09-27 122851.png
    Screenshot 2021-09-27 122851.png
    6 KB · Views: 183
Physics news on Phys.org
Murray Inglis said:
I thought the work done would be the work done by tension (9751 x 50.4), but I'm not sure if this works.
Sounds good to me.
 
Doc Al said:
Sounds good to me.
Oh great, thanks. It was a 7 mark question so it just felt like I was missing something.
 
Murray Inglis said:
Oh great, thanks. It was a 7 mark question so it just felt like I was missing something.
You are missing the units next to the numbers you provided. If I were scoring this, I would subtract at least 1 mark for this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K