Work done to stretch a spring vs Work done by a spring?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the equations for work done to stretch a spring versus the work done by a spring on an object. Participants explore the differences in the equations, the physical implications of these differences, and the underlying principles of work and energy in the context of springs.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the equations for work done to stretch a spring and work done by a spring are mathematically similar but differ in the order of terms, leading to confusion.
  • One participant emphasizes the distinction between work done on the spring and work done by the spring, suggesting that the physics explanation for the positioning of x's in the equations needs clarification.
  • Another participant asserts that the works done are equal but opposite, indicating a relationship between the two scenarios.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of internal forces within the spring that resist the external force applied to stretch it, relating this to the principle of action and reaction.
  • A participant raises the issue of defining x1 and x2, suggesting that clarity in their definitions could help resolve confusion regarding the sign of the work done.
  • One participant describes how the sign of work relates to whether energy is being put into or extracted from the spring.
  • Another participant explains the derivation of the work equations based on the initial and final positions of the spring, highlighting the reversal of terms when considering work done by the spring.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical relationship between the two forms of work but express differing views on the physical interpretation and implications of the equations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the deeper physics explanation for the positioning of terms in the equations.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of x1 and x2, as well as the assumptions made about the direction of displacement and the resulting signs of work. These factors contribute to the ongoing confusion among participants.

lu6cifer
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Why is it that the equation for work done to stretch a spring is
W = 1/2k(x22-x12)

while the work done by a spring on an object is
W = 1/2k(x12-x22) ?

That is, how come it's x22-x12 for the first case, and x12-x22 for the second?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In one case it's the work done on the spring and in the other its work done by the spring.
 
No, I get the semantics part, that in one case it's work done on a spring and in another it's work that's being done by the spring, but what's the physics explanation for why the x's are positioned where they are?
 
The works done are equal, but opposite.
 
I realize that they're opposites, meaning one is a positive value and the other is negative, but how is that determined? That is, how would you derive that based on the laws of physics?
 
lu6cifer said:
I realize that they're opposites, meaning one is a positive value and the other is negative, but how is that determined? That is, how would you derive that based on the laws of physics?

If a spring is stretched by a force, there are internal forces acting on the deformations of the spring, in a manner resisting the external applied force which stretches the spring, and their work is opposite of the work done by the external force. If the spring stretches, intuitively you could say that the particles in the spring tend to move apart, so between them there act forces which "try to move them back together". Fundamentally, it's the principle of action and reaction.
 
lu6cifer said:
I realize that they're opposites, meaning one is a positive value and the other is negative, but how is that determined? That is, how would you derive that based on the laws of physics?
Displacement is calculated by convention to be positive.

Draw a set of axes. If you start at the origin and move to the right 5 units, your displacement is (x2-x1)=5-0=5. If you start at the origin and move to the left, your displacement is (x1-x2)=0-(-5)=5.
 
I think that the confusion arises because x1 and x2 haven't actually been defined here. One x is the shorter length and the other is the longer length. It would be better to state that you put the 'start' value and 'finish' value in the same place in the formula every time. This will produce a sign for the value of work which tells you whether it's put in or got out.
The two quoted versions of the formulae are 'verbal' ways of indicating the sign of the answer.
I hope that hasn't just added confusion!
 
The 'sign' of the work refers to whether you put energy in or get it out.
 
  • #10
Realize that you are replying to a thread almost 9 months old.
 
  • #11
Durr!
Will try harder next time.
 
  • #12
When an object does work on another object, it applies a force for a distance (W=Fd). Initially the work done or energy stored on a spring is (1/2)k(x1)^2 and the final is (1/2)k(x2)^2, which results in W=(1/2)k((x2)^2-(x1)^2). Now, when the spring releases, the initial position is x2 while the final position is x1, thus the order of the 2 terms in brackets become reversed. It can also be thought of as negative work done on the object. (-(a-b)=b-a) where a is x1 and b is x2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K