Work-Energy Theorem: Effect of increasing speed vs stopping distance.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Work-Energy Theorem and its application to calculating the effect of increased speed on a car's stopping distance. When the speed of a car is increased by 50%, the minimum braking distance increases by a factor of 2.25, based on the relationship between kinetic energy and work done. The key equations used include W = Fd and W = ΔE_k, with the assumption that the braking force remains constant. The calculations confirm that the stopping distance must be 2.25 times larger to account for the increased kinetic energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Work-Energy Theorem
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy equations
  • Basic knowledge of forces and motion
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of constant braking force on stopping distances
  • Explore the relationship between speed and kinetic energy in greater detail
  • Learn about the effects of varying braking forces on stopping distances
  • Investigate real-world applications of the Work-Energy Theorem in automotive safety
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, automotive engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of vehicle stopping distances and safety measures.

Senjai
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the speed of a car is increased by 50%, by what factor will the minimum braking distance be increased assuming all else is the same? Ignore the driver's reaction time.


Homework Equations


[tex]W = Fd \cdot cos\theta[/tex]
[tex]W = \Delta{E_k}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


First i declared:
[tex]Fd = \frac{1}{2}mv^2[/tex]

Where d would be the stopping distance, there is no final velocity because its stopping. I then stated:

[tex]Fd = \frac{1}{2}m(1.5v)^2[/tex]
[tex]Fd = \frac{1}{2}m\cdot2.25v^2[/tex]

so due that F, the applied braking force is constant, the mass remains constant of course, the only thing that changes is the kinetic energy is multiplied by 2.25, so for Fd to correspond, d would have to be 2.25 times larger correct?

This question has no answer in the key..

Personal Reference: Q24 p. 145

Im always so horrible with these questions that don't give any data for the variables .. :S

Thanks,
Senjai
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump again :( can someone please.. pretty please, confirm :)
 
You're first declaration: F*d = (1/2)*m*v^2 seems logical, you're assuming all kinetic energy must be reduced to zero by the work done through braking.

The assumption that the braking force is constant in both situations seems adequate for the problem.

If speed is increased to 1.5 that of the original, you look good in saying that d should be 2.25 times as long as originally determined. Your work makes sense to me.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K