Work in Physics: Does it Always Involve Movement?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter adjacent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movement Physics Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of work in physics, particularly whether work always involves movement and how it relates to forces acting on objects. Participants explore scenarios in space, circular motion, and the implications of applying force without displacement, touching on theoretical and conceptual aspects of work and energy transfer.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference the definition of work as requiring displacement in the direction of the applied force, questioning if work is done when an object moves indefinitely in space without external forces acting on it.
  • There is a discussion about centripetal force in circular motion, with some arguing that it does not do work since it is perpendicular to the velocity of the object, while others suggest that work was done to initiate the motion.
  • Participants express confusion about calculating work done, particularly in scenarios involving infinite displacement and the role of force over time.
  • Some participants propose that work is done only when a force is applied and that once the force is removed, no further work is done despite the object continuing to move.
  • There are claims that energy is wasted due to inefficiencies in muscle use, leading to fatigue even when no external work is done on an object.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on the nature of work, the role of forces in motion, and the implications of energy transfer in different scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the definitions of displacement and force, as well as the conditions under which work is considered to be done. There is also a recognition of the complexities involved in real-world applications versus idealized scenarios.

adjacent
Gold Member
Messages
1,552
Reaction score
62
Wikipedia defines work as:
In physics, a force is said to do work when it acts on a body so that there is a displacement of the point of application, however small, in the direction of the force. Thus a force does work when it results in movement.
What if in space,where there is no external force acting,Someone applies a force and the object will move on to a infinite displacement forever(Newton's first law).Is work done?

Another question is from that wikipedia:
For example, the centripetal force exerted inwards by a string on a ball in uniform circular motion sideways constrains the ball to circular motion restricting its movement away from the center of the circle. This force does zero work because it is perpendicular to the velocity of the ball.
Work done=Energy transferred . That means in circular motion no energy is transferred to the object ,not even kinetic.Then how can it move?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi adjacent! :smile:
adjacent said:
What if in space,where there is no external force acting,Someone applies a force and the object will move on to a infinite displacement forever(Newton's first law).Is work done?

work is done is getting the object moving

once it is moving, it carries on in a straight line at the same speed (Newton's first law of motion) without any more force

"its work is done!" :wink:
Work done=Energy transferred . That means in circular motion no energy is transferred to the object ,not even kinetic.Then how can it move?

work was done to get it moving

the string keeps it in a circle, but doesn't reduce its speed

no further work is neeeded
 
tiny-tim said:
hi adjacent! :smile:


work is done is getting the object moving

once it is moving, it carries on in a straight line at the same speed (Newton's first law of motion) without any more force

"its work is done!" :wink:
How can I calculate the work done then?
W=FS
It moves to an infinite distance,Meaning work done is infinite?
 
tiny-tim said:
hi adjacent! :smile:
...
work was done to get it moving

the string keeps it in a circle, but doesn't reduce its speed

no further work is neeeded
We need centripetal force all the time it is moving in a circle,meaning work is done always?
 
adjacent said:
How can I calculate the work done then?
W=FS
It moves to an infinite distance,Meaning work done is infinite?

no, S is the displacement of the point of application of the force

the force is only applied at the start (to get it going)

after that, there is no force (so zero displacement)
adjacent said:
We need centripetal force all the time it is moving in a circle,meaning work is done always?

the displacement (of the point of application of the force) is tangential, the force is radial

so the displacement "in the direction of the force" (see wikipedia) is zero

the full formula is the dot product, W = F·S
 
tiny-tim said:
no, S is the displacement of the point of application of the force

the force is only applied at the start (to get it going)

after that, there is no force (so zero displacement)
But displacement is defined as the distance traveled in a stated direction.No force is needed.
Or do you mean S is the displacement(in the direction of force) covered when the force is still there?

Again
tiny-tim said:
the displacement (of the point of application of the force) is tangential, the force is radial

so the displacement "in the direction of the force" (see wikipedia) is zero

the full formula is the dot product, W = F·S
We still apply a force and get tired why?If no work is done,then we would not get tired?
 
Last edited:
adjacent said:
But displacement is defined as the distance traveled in a stated direction.No force is needed.
Or do you mean S is the displacement(in the direction of force) covered when the force is still there?

yes

the displacement is of the point of application of the force

when the force is no longer applied, it no longer has a point of application!
We still apply a force and get tired why?If no work is done,then we would not get tired?

stand between two doorposts, and push apart

the doorposts don't move, but parts of your body do move, and work is done

now relax your arms … if they were made of elastic, you would get all the energy back, and then do the same again without getting tired

but they're not made of elastic, so the energy is wasted, and if you do it again, you have do work all over again
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
adjacent said:
But displacement is defined as the distance traveled in a stated direction.No force is needed.
Or do you mean S is the displacement(in the direction of force) covered when the force is still there?
Think of it this way: work is only done when a force is applied. Imagine you and an object are the only two things in the whole universe. Start with the object at rest (relative to you) and push on it. You apply a force and the object accelerates from rest to some velocity in a certain distance while you push on it. Because you're applying a force and the object is moving, you're doing work. F isn't 0 and s isn't 0 in the W = F \cdot s equation, so W also isn't 0.

But once you let go of the object, it no longer accelerates. It travels at constant velocity and it does have a displacement, however you're no longer applying a force. Now W = 0 \cdot s = 0. So you can see that no work is done even though the object moves. :smile:

That was an ideal situation where the only force was your pushing. So that you could see the concept clearly, I neglected an important fact: just by having mass you would be attracting the object gravitationally and the object would be attracting you. So even once you let go of the object and you're not pushing on it, there would still be a gravitational force pulling it back toward you. Does this force do work?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
adjacent said:
We still apply a force and get tired why?If no work is done,then we would not get tired?
We are inefficient, 0% efficiency in some circumstances. You get tired, not because you are doing external work, but because you are wasting lots of energy generating heat by using your muscles inefficiently.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K