Work, kinetic energy, potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The equation Work = ΔK + ΔU + ΔE applies to nonconservative forces, where energy can be transformed between kinetic and potential forms. When potential energy converts to kinetic energy, the changes in energy terms will have opposite signs, resulting in no net change in work. Energy conservation remains intact, even when some energy is lost to the environment, such as through air resistance. Nonconservative forces indicate that energy may leave the system, but the total energy is still conserved. Understanding these principles clarifies how energy transitions occur within a system without violating conservation laws.
Bengo
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me understand this equation: Work = ΔK + ΔU + ΔE (no heat). Where K is kinetic energy, U is potential energy, and E is internal energy.

This is for nonconservative forces only right? I'm just confused about what if some potential energy is converted into kinetic energy, wouldn't that mean we are counting this amount of energy twice?

Does non conservative forces mean energy leaves the system?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ΔK etc. have signs. If some potential energy is converted into equal kinetic energy then the two Δ terms will have opposite signs and equal magnitude, so will cancel.
 
Work = ΔK + ΔU + ΔE is the equation for the energy gained or lost by a system. It's the sum of all the possible ways to change the energy stored in the system.

Within the system it's possible to convert energy from one form to another but as harupex says the sign will be different so overall the work is constant. eg Man falling off a cliff ΔU is negative, ΔK is positive. No net change in work.

Energy is allways conserved. As wikipedia says..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_force

"Nonconservative forces can only arise in classical physics due to neglected degrees of freedom".

In other words the man doesn't hit the ground as fast as expected because you forgot or ignored air resistance. In that case the ΔU and ΔK don't exactly balance. In this case energy has been lost by the system (to the air) but overall energy is still conserved.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top