Calculating Work of a Point on a Cycloid: A Method for Integrating Along the Arc

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gh778
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by a point on a cycloid as a wheel rolls, considering the pressure difference inside and outside the wheel. The primary equations involved include the work formula W=Fdcos(t) and the cycloid equations for x and y coordinates. Participants debate the relevance of pressure and force, with some asserting that the work done on a point is zero due to the perpendicular motion of the point relative to the force. There is also confusion about integrating along the arc and the interpretation of variables, leading to clarifications about the need to consider small lengths rather than points. Ultimately, the focus is on deriving the work done through integration along the arc length while addressing the complexities of the problem.
Gh778
Messages
419
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A wheel turns and moves in translation like a wheel of a bike on the road (cycloid). Inside the wheel there is the pressure P from a gas. Outside the wheel there is no pressure. Calculate the work of a point from pi/2 to pi/2+a. The radius of the wheel is 1. The pressure P is 1.

Given datas:

Radius of the wheel = 1
Difference of pressure = 1

gry1.jpg


Homework Equations



The work:

W=Fdcos(t)

Equation of the cycloid:

x=r(t-sin(t))
y=r(1-cos(t))

The Attempt at a Solution

I integrate the distance by the cos(angle) of the force:

\int_{\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{ \pi}{2}+a}(t-sin(t)) cos(\pi/2-t) dt

+

\int_{\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{ \pi}{2}+a} (1-cos(t)) sin(\pi/2-t) dt

The work is the sum of the result of the two last integrales ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Gh,
Could you re-read your problem statement as if you were an outsider ?
It makes no sense to me at all. What are the variables that play a role in this exercise and the known/given data ?
Scalars, vectors, units, whatever,
List them and use the same names in the equations and your solution attempt.
 
Thanks for the picture. I suppose this problem statement is the full text as is was posed to you ?
Is there a context ? Introduction of the work concept in a classical mechanics course, for example ?

Is F the consequence of the pressure difference ?
I think I have to pass on this one, except that perhaps a trivial answer is in order: it looks to me as if a point on the rim is not doing work, since its motion is at all times perpendicular to such a force: ##\alpha = \pi/2 \ \Rightarrow\ W = 0##. What brings you to write ## W = F\;d\; \cos t ## ? I thought ##W = \int \vec F \cdot \vec{ds} ## ?
 
Yes, it is the only picture I have. And yes, classical mechanics course: exercices.

Yes, F come from the difference of pressure.

I simplify the vectors because I used dx, dy (small movement at x and y) I can't ?

Because the wheel is moving in translation and is rotating, the force from the pressure is perpendicular of the wall but the dx, and dy is not a rotation of a circle it is a translation too, why do you think the work is at 0 ?
 
So if the gas pressure is P, what is the force F (in Newton) ?

Suppose there is non zero work done, where does the energy go ?

What if your wheel is a 1 m3 cubic box, sliding on a frictionless floor in vacuo ?
 
The force is F=P*S (pressure*surface) if the depth is 1 the force is F=P*L (pressure*length)

A point needs an energy but another one gives this same energy. If I calculate the work all around the circle (for each point) the sum is at 0.

I think it's a simple exercice, no friction, and only a difference of pressure for give the force.
 
And what exactly is S for a point ? I haven't seen a depth in this problem so far. Where does that appear in the list of all variables ?
 
A point moves, so there is a length, ok ? If the depth is at 1 the formula F=P*S is the same with F=P*L because S=L*depth, ok ?
S is not a variable, because the problem is only a 2D problem, I added S because you want to know the force from the pressure.
 
This question only makes sense if the F force is an applied force tending to restrain motion of the cylinder . In which case calc is very simple .

If cylinder is rigid then gas pressure inside is irrelevant to problem .

If cylinder was flexible like a real tyre then there would be some friction and heating effects but there is no mention of this in problem statement .
 
  • #10
Sure, the cylinder (the circle) is rigid. Why it's irrelevant ? I found integrales and I just want to be sure. It's only a point that moves with a force on it (with an angle) on it, it's not so complex than that.
 
  • #11
Nidum said:
If cylinder is rigid then gas pressure inside is irrelevant to problem .
Work done depends on reference frame. Yes, it's an odd way to consider work, but quite valid.
BvU said:
What if your wheel is a 1 m3 cubic box, sliding on a frictionless floor in vacuo ?
To the observer, the gas is doing work on the leading face of the box, that leading face is doing the same work on the sides of the box, which do that work on the trailing face, which returns the work to the gas.
Gh778 said:
A point moves, so there is a length, ok ? If the depth is at 1 the formula F=P*S is the same with F=P*L because S=L*depth, ok ?
S is not a variable, because the problem is only a 2D problem, I added S because you want to know the force from the pressure.
Not following that. It does seem to me to be wrong to ask about work done on a point. We can interpret pressure here as force per unit length, and there will be work done per unit length of circumference in the vicinity of a point, but zero work done on an individual point.
It may come down to the interpretation of ##\alpha##. It could refer to how far the wheel rotates as the work is done, or it could mean we are to consider the work done on an arc length ##r\alpha##. But it presumably does not mean both, so either way we are msiing a length somewhere.

Turning to the equations in the OP, I don't get the right initial co-ordinates when I substitute t=pi/2. I would also check whether the co-ordinates and force look right at t=pi.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
  • #12
Hello,

I wrote all the equations and integrate the work. Haruspex, I need to add the length of the arc in my equation ? If I want the work, I can multiply my result by the length of the arc and by the depth, no ?

Equation of the cycloid:

Radius=R=1

x=t-sin(t)
y=1-cos(t)

Length of a small segment:

\sqrt( (dy/dt)^2 +(dx/dt)^2 )

Derivate of x:

1-cos(t)

Derivate of y:

sin(t)

Length of the segment:

L=\sqrt( sin(t)^2+(1-cos(t))^2)

L=\sqrt( 2-2cos(t) )

Tangencial angle: dy/dx:

T= sin(t) / (1-cos(t))

Perpendicular of the surface:

P=-1/( sin(t) / (1-cos(t)))

The angle for the force:

\int_{\alpha_0}^{\alpha_1} L * -cos(atan(P)-pi/2.0+t) dt

or

\int_{\alpha_0}^{\alpha_1} L * -cos(atan(P)+pi/2.0-t) dt

I'm not sure about the sign of +pi/2-t or -pi/2+t

The final integral of work for a point:W=\int_{\alpha_0}^{\alpha_1} \sqrt(2-2 \cos(t)) (-1) \cos(\tan^(-1)(-1/((\sin(t))/(1-\cos(t))))-\pi/2+t) dt = \frac{\sqrt(2)}{2} \sqrt(1-\cos(t)) \csc(\frac{1}{2} t) (-t \sin(-\frac{1}{2} t+\tan^(-1)(\tan(\frac{1}{2} t))+\frac{\pi}{2})+\sin(t) \sin(-\frac{1}{2} t+\tan^(-1)(\tan(\frac{1}{2} t))+\frac{\pi}{2})+\cos(t) \cos(-\frac{1}{2} t+\tan^(-1)(\tan(\frac{1}{2} t))+\frac{\pi}{2}))+constant

It is not the question at start but for a surface it is:

At start I take R=1, so the work is :

Ws=W \alpha D

With D the depth.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Sorry for this message it was an error
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Here the integral but I will try to optimise them, I have difficulties with the angle, I think the rest of the calculations are correct:
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/901/PJ5vj0.png

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/661/q4trAN.png
I give the code for a numerical integration:
Code:
from mpmath import *

mp.dps=150; mp.pretty=True

D=0.1
S1=pi/2.0
S2=3.0*pi/2.0w=0.0000000000000001

def rectangles(f,a,b,n) :
   h=(b-a)/n/1.0
   z=0.0
   for i in range(n) :
     z=z+f(a+i*h)
   return h*z

def sx1(t):
   y1= -1/( sin(t) / (1-cos(t)) )

   if t<pi:
     signe=-1.0
   else:
     signe=1.0

   if t>0.0 and t<=pi/2.0:
      y2=2*pi+(atan(y1)-pi)
     angle=2*pi+(-pi/2.0-t)
   if t>pi/2.0 and t<=pi:
     y2=2.0*pi+(atan(y1)-pi)
     angle=2*pi+(-pi/2.0-t)
   if t>pi and t<=3.0*pi/2.0:
     y2=atan(y1)
     angle=2*pi+(-pi/2.0-t)
   if t>3.0*pi/2.0 and t<=2.0*pi:
     y2=atan(y1)
     angle=2*pi+(-pi/2.0-t)
   ang=y2-angle

   return sqrt( 2-2*cos(t) ) * signe*(cos(ang))D=pi/2.0
S1=0.1
w1=rectangles(sx1,S1+w,S1+w+D,10000

print w1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
I found an expression for the angle, and like that I can integrate for any value without the function abs :P=-1/( sin(t) / (1-cos(t)))

\int_{\alpha_0}^{\alpha_1} \sqrt(2-2cos(t)) * cos(atan(P)-3*pi/2+t)

I give the link to see the result: link

If someone could said if the expression is good ?

Haruspex: I'm just understood the problem with the work of a point but it's not a point it's a dl, a small length of the curve, I'm confused because I used the word "point" but it is a small length, this small length come from the integration of the curve. At final, with my integration, I need to multiply by the depth only ?
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Gh778 said:
it is a small length, this small length come from the integration of the curve.
It seems to me that, generalising a little, we are trying to determine the area swept out by a small length of arc as the wheel rotates through some angle. Multiplying that by the pressure will give the work done.
Consider a point at theta before the vertical at time t=0. (I.e. it will be at the top at time ##\theta/\omega##.)
The radial component of its instantaneous speed is ##v\sin(\theta)## (agreed?). We now have to integrate this twice, once along the arc (angle dl/r) and again over time (##\alpha/\omega##?). Just have to be careful with the way the bounds change.

I would have thought the algebra would be fairly straightforward.
 
  • #17
I'm agree with the velocity ##v\sin(\theta)## if ##v=\omega R##, correct ?

I have 2 questions:

1/ how can I integrate along the arc (angle dl/r) ? I don't understand the method, if you could explain a little more your method please ?

2/ Why I can't integrate twice my integral ? I can integrate from ##\alpha_0## to ##\alpha_1## for the work of one point and again from ##\alpha_0## to ##\alpha_1## for have the work for the arc and after I multiply by the depth, is it correct ?

Thanks for your help Haruspex :)
 
  • #18
I was wrong, I took the bad angle, P is not necessary, I use T :T=sin(t) / (1-cos(t))

\int_{\alpha_0}^{\alpha_1} \sqrt(2-2cos(t)) * cos(atan(T)-3*pi/2+t)
 
  • #19
Gh778 said:
1/ how can I integrate along the arc (angle dl/r) ? I don't understand the method, if you could explain a little more your method please
Suppose the arc is as theta goes from ##\alpha## to ##\beta##, and the disc rolls through an angle ##\phi##. ##dl=r(\beta-\alpha)##.
The point which starts at angle theta finishes at angle ##\theta-\phi## and travels a radial distance ##\int_{u=\theta}^{\theta-\phi}v\sin(u)\frac{du}{\omega}##.
After solving that, integrate theta across its range.
 
  • Like
Likes Gh778
Back
Top