Worst load cases lattice structure

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying the worst load cases for a lattice structure used in a ship-to-shore crane model as part of a finite element method (FEM) design course. Participants explore how to effectively apply loads to the boom of the crane, which is made up of beam elements, and seek to determine critical load positions without having to analyze every possible load application point.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests modeling the load at each lattice point along the boom and plotting a curve to identify critical points, while also considering horizontal wind loads that may exceed vertical gravitational forces.
  • Another participant proposes approximating the lattice structure as a simple beam, comparing it to an I-beam, and calculating equivalent properties to simplify the analysis.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that placing the load as close to the end of the boom may yield maximum stress, while also questioning whether the weight of the structure and environmental factors are being considered in the model.
  • Concerns are raised about the effects of dynamic loading, such as swinging weights or abrupt stops, on the crane's performance.
  • Some participants note that the construction method of the boom may not significantly affect its response to loading, despite the complexity of lattice structures compared to other designs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the best approach to model the loads and the implications of the boom's construction method. There is no consensus on the optimal strategy for identifying worst load cases, and multiple competing views remain regarding the modeling techniques and considerations for environmental factors.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions, such as the impact of environmental loading and the simplification of the lattice structure to a beam model. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the best methods for load application and analysis.

DaanD
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Introduction
Dear all,
I'm working on an assignment to model a ship-to-shore crane for a FEM design course. Having modeled the crane, I now need to apply the load of the trolley (which is hoisting the container) on the boom (which in my case is a lattice structure made up of beam elements).

The total load of the trolley will be applied on the boom in 4 points (1 for each corner of the trolley) the load on an arbitrary position is shown in the image.

331zsrt.jpg


The question
Instead of applying the load at every possible position (which are a lot), I want to find the worst load cases along the lattice structure and only calculate the stresses when the loads are in those positions. I however have a hard time determining where that might be. If the boom would be model as just a single beam, it would be a lot easier. However, thanks to the lattice structure I have a hard time imaging where to apply the loads. Perhaps someone can point me in the right direction?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think you first need to model the load at each lattice point along the boom.
Plot a curve to show where the most critical points along the boom may be.
Then model say eight smaller step positions along the boom between two lattice points in that region.

Remember that the horizontal wind load on a lattice structure can often be more than the vertical gravitational forces.
 
DaanD said:
If the boom would be model as just a single beam, it would be a lot easier.

You can model it approximately as a simple beam. It acts like an I-beam with the top and bottom rails as the flanges, and other parts carrying the shear load between them like the web of an I-beam.

You could calculate the equivalent "I" value approximately, by ignoring the "web" and just including the top and bottom rails. Or, take your existing model, delete the irrelevant parts, load it like a cantilever, and find the equivalent "EI" value from the deflection you get. If you have time, it would be instructive to do both and compare them (and compare them with your detailed model).

I real life you would probably design the crane by doing this backwards: start by assuming the boom is a simple beam, then figure out the lightest/cheapest way to make that beam from a truss structure.

Actually, you can probably get some useful information from shear force and bending moment diagrams, without calculating the equivalent beam properties at all - just by realizing that the structure acts like a beam.
 
Last edited:
Your best bet for maximum stress is still putting the load as close to the end of the boom as you can.

It's not clear from the OP if you are also modeling the weight of the structure and if you are including any environmental loading. Since this crane is transferring suspended weights, have you considered what might happen if the suspended weight starts swinging, or otherwise be upset by wind or coming to an abrupt stop at the end of its travel along the boom?

As the others have said, the method of construction of the boom is unlikely to affect how it responds to being loaded. Lattice structures, while being more complicated to construct, are generally lighter than other methods of construction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K