Would anyone mind checking my work? - Calc 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter opticaltempest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calc 2 Mind Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a Calculus 2 problem involving integration to find a position function. The original poster expresses concern about discrepancies between their results and those obtained using Maple 10, specifically regarding the evaluation of constants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks feedback on their detailed work and is trying to identify errors in their integration process. Some participants point out specific errors in the calculations, while others discuss the importance of detailed mathematical writing in coursework.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's work, offering specific feedback on errors and discussing the broader topic of mathematical writing in academic settings. There is no explicit consensus on the original poster's calculations, but constructive guidance has been provided.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is working on a graded assignment that requires detailed solutions, and there is a mention of the challenges faced in writing out mathematical work thoroughly. Participants also share their experiences with writing requirements in their respective majors.

opticaltempest
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
The images below are scanned images of work for one of my assigned problems in Calculus 2. Right now I am only concerned with integrating in order to find a position function (ignoring the constant of integration for time being).

How does it look? I am checking my work with Maple 10. I do not get the same results when I evaluate Maple's resulting function and my function at the given values for the constants. I can't find my error(s) :( Anyone care to look?

Page 1 -
http://img108.imageshack.us/img108/8109/page010dy.jpg"

Page 2 -
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/9177/page028zi.jpg"

Page 3 -
http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/2531/page035tl.jpg"

Page 4 -
http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/456/page046xs.jpg"

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an error in the last line of the last page (page 4).
You multiplied the contents of the square brackets by -u.
But you forget to change the sign of all of the terms within the square brackets!
 
Just out of curiosity, do you always write your work out in that much detail or was that for our benefit? I think my hand would fall off if I wrote every problem I did like that.
 
I don't write out all of my homework in this detail. This is a more complicated problem assigned by my instructor that we turn in for a grade. Sometimes it helps out with partial credit if I make some mistakes early in the problem.

I'm anal about my organization. It can be frustrating when I take mathematics tests. I hate having to works problems in a hurry. It causes me to scribble bits and pieces of a problem all over the paper.

I wish mathematics courses, specifically calculus, would put some emphasis on mathematical writing.

When is formal mathematical writing taught in an undergraduate mathematics program?
 
I think it would vary from place to place.

As a physics major I was expected to do some writing in my Linear Algebra and Differential Equations classes. Both of those classes had long-term final projects for which I had to write a paper and do a presentation in front of the class, those were both in my Sophomore year. In my Junior year we had long term written assignments in my Classical Mechanics class, this was a requirement by the department since they found that many Physics seniors were having a very hard time doing the kind of writing which is necessary for articles or grant applications. In my senior year (this year, next quarter) I will be expected to write and present a research piece on a subject of my choice, there's an entire 4 unit upper division writing class devoted to this.

Edit: As a Math major I would expect that you'd be doing a lot more writing, I imagine that the upper division math classes largely consist of proofs which you will be expected to write out in some detail.
 
Last edited:
dicerandom said:
Edit: As a Math major I would expect that you'd be doing a lot more writing, I imagine that the upper division math classes largely consist of proofs which you will be expected to write out in some detail.

Yes, very much the case for me as a math major. Real analysis especially so, under grad was tough with the proofs needing to be detailed and rigorous [Rudin], but the grad version was brutal :cry: ! Necessary and sufficient conditions for some obscure theorem to hold it seems that all problems are proofs or disproofs by counter-example.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
22K
Replies
2
Views
1K