Write the given hyperbolic function as simply as possible

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying the hyperbolic function represented by the expression e^x/(1+e^{2x}). Participants are exploring different approaches to rewrite this expression in a simpler form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to manipulate the expression by multiplying or dividing by e^x to simplify it. Others question the necessity of rewriting 1 as cosh x + sinh x and point out that the original expression is not an equation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to simplify the expression. Some participants have provided insights into rewriting the expression, while others have raised questions about the correctness of certain representations. No explicit consensus has been reached, but there are productive discussions regarding the simplification process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original expression is presented as it appears in a textbook, and there is a recognition of the need to clarify the nature of the expression versus an equation. Some participants express a desire to correct their previous statements regarding the representation of e^x.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
425
Homework Statement
##\dfrac{e^x}{1+e^{2x}}##
Relevant Equations
hyperbolic equations
My take;

##2\cosh x = e^x +e^{-x}##

I noted that i could multiply both sides by ##e^x## i.e

##e^x⋅2\cosh x = e^x(e^x +e^{-x})##

##e^x⋅2\cosh x = e^{2x}+1##

thus,

##\dfrac{e^x}{1+e^{2x}}=\dfrac{\cosh x + \sinh x}{e^x⋅2\cosh x}##

##= \dfrac{\cosh x + \sinh x}{(\cosh x + \sinh x)⋅2\cosh x}##

##=\dfrac{1}{2\cosh x}##
any other approach is welcome.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
Homework Statement:: ##\dfrac{e^x}{1+e^{2x}}##
Relevant Equations:: hyperbolic equations

both sides
There are no 'sides'
There is no 'equation'

You post an expression. If you divide numerator and denominator by ##e^x## you see that you can rewrite the expression as ##1\over 2\cosh x##: the numerator is now ##1## and the denominator is now ##2\cosh x##. There is no need to write ##1## as ##\cosh x + \sinh x##

Cheers !

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
There are no 'sides'
There is no 'equation'

You post an expression. If you divide numerator and denominator by ##e^x## you see that you can rewrite the expression as ##1\over 2\cosh x##: the numerator is now ##1## and the denominator is now ##2\cosh x##. There is no need to write ##1## as ##\cosh x + \sinh x##

Cheers !

##\ ##
...seen that...correct man ! it's an expression ...i just posted exactly as it appears on textbook...i should have checked that or rather introduced ##f(x)## on the lhs.
 
BvU said:
There is no need to write ##1## as ##\cosh x + \sinh x##
the more so because it is totally incorrect :biggrin: ! My bad, I should have written "##e^x## as ##\cosh x + \sinh x## "
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K