1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Writing up the charge distribution with Dirac's delta

  1. Feb 27, 2013 #1

    fluidistic

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    In electrostatics it's useful to have ##\rho (\vec x )## written with Dirac's delta so that we can know the total charge by integrating the charge distribution over a region of space.
    Many problems/situations deal with point charges. In Cartesian coordinates for example, ##\rho (\vec x ) = q \delta (x+3) \delta (y ) \delta (z)## means there's a charge q situated at (-3,0,0).
    My question is, how do you write up the charge distribution of a point charge in spherical coordinates ##(r, \theta , \phi )## when the charge lies over the z-axis? (or at the origin for example).
    Because in such a coordinate system, the angle "phi" is not well defined for the z-axis. And at the origin both phi and theta are not well defined. So I don't know how to write the charge distribution in such cases.
    Thank you!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 28, 2013 #2

    fluidistic

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I've tried a few things, like if a charge q is at ##(d_1,0,0)## in Cartesian coordinates. In spherical coordinates I tried
    1)##\rho (\vec x ) =q \frac{\delta (\theta ) \delta (r-d_1 ) \delta ( \phi )}{r^2 \sin \theta }##. In this case I reached what I should, namely that ##q=\int \rho (\vec x ) d ^3x##.
    2)##\rho (\vec x ) =q \frac{\delta (\theta ) \delta (r-d_1 ) \delta ( \phi - \text {any value between 0 and 2 \pi} )}{r^2 \sin \theta }## which also works well.
    3)##\rho (\vec x ) =q \frac{\delta (\theta ) \delta (r-d_1 ) }{r \sin \theta }## which doesn't yield ##q= \int \rho (\vec x ) d^3 x## so that's really bad.
    4)Other variants that didn't work.

    Overall, only when I chose an arbitrary value for phi, I could get a sensical result. However I'm not satisfied that any value for phi work, because when I use ##\rho (\vec x )## in other equations, it makes a big difference what the value of phi is, and not any value will work.
    Example: For the Green function in the case of a conducting sphere at potential 0, the potential is given by ##\Phi (\vec x ) = \int G(x,x') \rho (x' )d^3x'## where ##G(x,x')## does depend on phi and therefore ##\Phi## (the potential) will depend on the value I choose for phi in the Dirac's delta for rho, the charge density.
    Since the potential is uniquely determined, only 1 value for phi work. I just don't know how to find it. Thus my question, how to write rho (x) in spherical coordinates when there's a charge on the z-axis or on the origin.

    Edit: I found out the solution.
    It's to write up ##\rho (\vec x ) =q*k \frac{\delta (\theta ) \delta (r-d_1 ) }{r^2 \sin \theta }## where k=1/(2 pi) in my example. In general it's just evaluating the integral of the Jacobian of the coordinate system and integrate with respect to the "missing" Dirac's delta. That's worth the denominator. So in my example it's just 2 pi.
     
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2013
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Writing up the charge distribution with Dirac's delta
  1. Dirac delta (Replies: 5)

  2. Delta dirac (Replies: 6)

Loading...