Wrong interpretation of physics

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying and analyzing moments in the film "Terminator 1" where the portrayal of physics is considered incorrect. Participants are asked to provide examples of these inaccuracies and discuss the implications of such interpretations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various instances of perceived physics errors, particularly focusing on time travel and its implications. Questions arise regarding the mechanics of time travel, the transportation of objects, and the physical effects of gunfire on the Terminator character.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided specific examples of physics inaccuracies, while others seek clarification and further details. There is no explicit consensus on the examples or the nature of the inaccuracies discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express skepticism about the urgency of the request, suggesting it may be homework-related despite claims to the contrary. There is also a mention of the age of the film and its relevance to current academic discussions.

aloe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I need help with this, please.
Name three moments in the terminator 1 in which the physics was wrong. what was wrong with the physics, and what should have happened? I need it urgently and it is not a homework problem, but it is very urgent.

thanks, i appreciate it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Time Travel
2. Time Travel
3. Time Travel

I can't really think of anything else too impossible.
 
Vorde,

I don't think that is the answer. what was exactly wrong with the time travel? that is what i mean. also, was time travel the only physics related moment in terminator?
 
I only saw terminator 2, not terminator 1. Sorry.
 
aloe said:
I need help with this, please.
Name three moments in the terminator 1 in which the physics was wrong. what was wrong with the physics, and what should have happened? I need it urgently and it is not a homework problem, but it is very urgent.

thanks, i appreciate it

This sounds like a homework problem and should be posted as such.

What do YOU think they might be? We're here to help you, not spoon feed you answers.
 
Can you give us any more detail on what exactly you'd be looking for? Maybe give us at least 1 example of your own?

I am pretty sure it's not a homework question since this movie is about 25 years old and rated R, so unless the prof just loves Terminator 1 then he's kinda out of touch, especially when T2 and T3 had way better physics scenes to tear apart (Semi crushing the highway barricade, mobile crane tearing down an entire building and cityblock, etc.).
 
Oh yeah, he goes into the Gun Shop and orders a "Plasma Rifle with 40 watt range" in addition to a lot of conventional weapons.

A) How is Watts (1 Joule per second) an effective measurement of the distance a Plasma Rifle can shoot? (I think in this case, I'd pretend that Plasma is merely some arbitrarily large energy number, like..i don't know something measured in kilojoules.)

B) if Watts isn't an effective measurement of the distance an energy gun can shoot, what would make a better unit of measurement?


In the Dance Club scene, I *believe* The Terminator takes a shotgun to the chest and is thrown to the ground. If that's true, then how much force did the shotgun transfer to The Terminator, assuming The Terminator is 1 ton?
Also, keeping in mind the conservation of energy and momentum, how much force would the shotgun have on John Connor as he shot it? Why didn't he fly back, and if he was suppose to fly back, how far should he have gone, assuming he weighs 180 pounds?
 
aloe said:
I need help with this, please.
Name three moments in the terminator 1 in which the physics was wrong. what was wrong with the physics, and what should have happened? I need it urgently and it is not a homework problem, but it is very urgent.

thanks, i appreciate it
Two problems with time travel, one with material science.
1) You can't change history, hence you can't time travel.
-Even though general relativity wormhole models don't allow you to change history.
2) Neither O'Conner nor the Terminator could transport clothes or weapons back in time with them.
-They both appear naked without weapons. This implies that there is a law of physics which discriminates between robots and men versus weapons and clothes.
-They were able to transport all the Terminators parts, electronic and mechanical, with no difficulty. They were able to transport both O'Conner with all his organic materials. They transported the Terminator, with both organic and inorganic material. Why couldn't either side send their representative back with clothes, weapons or other supplies?
3) No dents on the Terminator,.
-He is hit with so many bullets and bombs. Yet, when his fleshy covering is burnt off, there are no dents.
 
Darwin123 said:
-He is hit with so many bullets and bombs. Yet, when his fleshy covering is burnt off, there are no dents.

Yeah, but he was made out of unobtanium, which doesn't dent. :smile:

Aloe, I think it is rude of you to say (1) you need this URGENTLY and (2) it is not homework, but then you don't say WHY you need it. What's the secrecy ?
 
  • #10
Creel said:
Oh yeah, he goes into the Gun Shop and orders a "Plasma Rifle with 40 watt range" in addition to a lot of conventional weapons.
I believe he said "in a 40 watt range"- 40 watts referring to a particular level out of a range of energies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K