Yes, that is correct. You can also write it as f(x) = 0 for x > 0 and f(0) = 1.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roni1985
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Pdes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the pointwise convergence of the sequence of functions defined by fn(x) = e^(-n*x) for x ≥ 0. It is established that f(0) = 1 and f(x) = 0 for x > 0 as n approaches infinity. The participants clarify that pointwise convergence involves fixing x and analyzing the limit as n approaches infinity, without the need for graphical representation or complex proofs. The conclusion confirms that the sequence converges pointwise to the function f(x).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pointwise convergence in sequences of functions
  • Familiarity with the exponential function and its properties
  • Basic knowledge of limits and continuity
  • Concepts of uniform convergence for comparison
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of pointwise and uniform convergence in detail
  • Explore the implications of convergence in the context of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Learn about the behavior of exponential functions as limits approach infinity
  • Investigate examples of sequences of functions and their convergence characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on analysis, calculus, and differential equations, will benefit from this discussion.

Roni1985
Messages
200
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


fn(x)= e-n*x
Determine whether or not the sequence fn converges pointwise for each x[tex]\geq[/tex]0


Homework Equations


when a sequence of functions converges pointwise, the following is satisfied.
f(x)=limN->inffn(x)


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to graph it and I can see that the function shifts down closer and closer to y=0.

But, I can't really think of a mathematical proof here.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dang I thought this was going to be an actual PDE question. There is really no need to graph nor is there reason for mathematical proof unless you are clueless about the exponential function. Remember for pointwise convergence we only consider what happens by fixing an x in the set under consideration and then letting n approach infinity. Now fix x = 0, what is the limiting function here? Now fix an arbitrary x > 0, what happens when you let n go to infinity then?
 
snipez90 said:
Dang I thought this was going to be an actual PDE question. There is really no need to graph nor is there reason for mathematical proof unless you are clueless about the exponential function. Remember for pointwise convergence we only consider what happens by fixing an x in the set under consideration and then letting n approach infinity. Now fix x = 0, what is the limiting function here? Now fix an arbitrary x > 0, what happens when you let n go to infinity then?
Hello,

I'm sorry, my title is misleading. we just went over uniform and pointwise convergence before using it with PDEs :\

Thank you for the response.

That was also my logic.

So, I just say that f(x)= 1 for x=0 and 0 for x>0

?

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K