Young's Double Slits - Derivation & Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter metalmaniac
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of the formula for Young's Double Slits experiment, specifically questioning the necessity of using the approximation sin(x) ≈ tan(x). It suggests that the exact formula λ = s sin(arctan(w/D)) could be used instead of λ = sw/D. The user expresses confusion about why the approximation is preferred when an exact solution exists. They acknowledge that while the exact solution is valid, the approximation simplifies understanding key concepts. The conversation highlights the balance between precision and conceptual clarity in physics.
metalmaniac
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Have a look at this.

http://www.matter.org.uk/schools/content/interference/formula.html"

I follow the derivation of the formula. However it seems to follow from the diagram that:

λ=ssin(arctan(w/D))

Without the need for the approximation sinx ≈ tanx.

I can't see how this can be true because why would we use λ=sw/D if we have an exact form.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Often you don't need the extra precision, and the approximation highlights the key concepts/features for a cursory understanding of the matter.
There's nothing wrong with the exact solution, of course.
 
Oh okay, thanks.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top