Young's Double Split Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter StudentofPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Split
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around Young's double-slit experiment, specifically focusing on calculating the wavelength of light based on the position of dark fringes. The original poster presents a scenario involving measurements from the experiment and expresses confusion over the calculations leading to incorrect wavelength values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the position of dark fringes and the wavelength calculation, examining the use of the fringe order and the implications of using half-integer values for dark fringes.

Discussion Status

The discussion has evolved with participants providing insights into the calculations and assumptions made regarding the fringe order. Some guidance has been offered on how to approach the problem of destructive interference in a different scenario involving loudspeakers, indicating a productive direction in the conversation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of determining angles for destructive interference without certain distance measurements, highlighting the constraints of the problem setup.

StudentofPhysics
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
1. In a Young's double-slit experiment, the seventh dark fringe is located 0.029 m to the side of the central bright finge on a flat screen, which is 1.1 m away from the slits. The separation between the slits is 1.5 x 10^-4 m. What is the wavelength of the light being used?



2. wavelength = d sin(theta)
Tan theta = y/x
y= 0.029m
x= 1.1m
d = 1.5 x 10^-4 m




3. Tan Theta = y/x = 0.029/1.1= 0.0264
Theta = 1.51

Wavelength = d sin (theta) = (1.5 x 10^-4) x 0.0264
Wavelength = 3.95 x 10^-6


This is not correct and I can't seem to place why.

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok, i see I forgot m, which equals 7.

entering this into the equation:

Sin Theta= 0.0264 = 7 x (Wavelength/(1.5 x 10^-4))

working this through gave me an answer of 2.772 x 10^-5 which was also incorrect...
 
i see i forgot +1/2 since it is a dark fringe.


working now...
 
Using 7.5 instead of 7 gave me an answer of 5.28 x 10^-7 which was still incorrect...


I think i am now completely stuck
 
I think I know what is wrong: you are using m=7.5. The first dark fringe does not occur at the centre, it is 1/2 shifted as the conditions for destructive interference specify. Your first dark fringe (m=0) is 1/2 shifted from the centre maximum, so if you count to the 7th dark fringe it isn't m=7.5. Try drawing it out. I hope this isn't confusing you but I think that might be the problem. Otherwise everything else looks OK.
 
thank you very much hage. it was 6.5 and I now have it correct.


do you think you could figure what I'm doing wrong on this problem?:



A rock concert is being held in an open field. Two loudspeakers are separated by 6.00 m. As an aid in arranging the seating, a test is conducted in which both speakers vibrate in phase and produce an 80.0 Hz bass tone simultaneously. The speed of sound is 343 m/s. A reference line is marked out in front of the speakers, perpendicular to the midpoint of the line between the speakers. Relative to either side of this reference line, what is the smallest angle that locates the places where destructive interference occurs? People seated in these places would have trouble hearing the 80.0 Hz bass tone.


d= 6.0
v= 343 m/s
f= 80.0Hz
wavelength = 343/80 = 4.2875

0.5 (4.2875) = 2.14375 = destructive interference

I don't know how to figure out the angle without the distance "l".


Any thoughts?
 
Well, you know what the path difference has to be for destructive interference, and you have the info to calculate it. I would take that value and set it equal to the equation for dark fringes and solve for the angle. See if that helps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
7K