vanesch
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 5,102
- 20
Townsend said:It's the same thing with nearly all democrats!
I would love nothing more than to be able to vote for a dem for next election but they need to represent my views before I will vote for them.
Too many people cannot stand the idea of anti-gun, anti-hunting, progressive tax, bigger government,... the list goes on. On a whole tonne of issues I go the way of the dems... I want funding for stem cells, I want to give women the right to choose if they want to have an abortion,... and the list goes on.
I really don't like the idea of having a religious president in office. I want a president that can actually give a decent speech without making an a$$ out of himself most of the time. I also know that Kerry or Gore would have been those things...
Alas I could not vote for either...why? Government is downward inflexible. It is a lot easier to make laws than it is to repeal laws. I have always been fearful of some ultra left wing president taking away too many of my personal liberties. Increasing taxes on income, sales, and investments, making more government programs...more bureaucrats, less private industries...and the list goes on.
Frankly that scares the crap of me!
You might not understand that but I hope it answers your question to at least some degree.
Well, what I understand is that you're willing to sacrifice about anything you value in a "good" president for some ideology which comes down what you call "personal freedom", but which are in fact just a few abstract illusions, like having the right to walk with a gun over the street to the next bar (but anyways not having the right to shoot the bastard who insults you :-), and have the very rich not pay a bit more taxes for you to get better comodities, and not asking people to be slightly respectful of the ecological system on which we all depend. Maybe a bright and right person cannot resolve himself in advocating this.
What I find strange is that you prefer to have a person that a) is quite dumb and b) goes against about half of what you value in office, rather than have a person a) that is quite bright and b) goes against about half of what you value in office. I'd prefer the bright guy.
I mean, even if I don't agree with my boss, I prefer a smart (and right) guy (or girl) over a dumb cheater, because I would be confident that even if he takes decisions that *I* personally don't like, they will be well-thought out and will be beneficial in some way.
EDIT: there's something else that struck me in your argumentation, about the impossibility to repeal laws: don't you think that you got a lot of VERY STRONG ANTI-LIBERTY laws now, which are much worse than preventing you to hunt a certain kind of bird a certain time of the year ?
Last edited: