Z-transform of conjugated sequence ( a straightforward exercise)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the z-transform of a conjugated sequence, specifically exploring the relationship expressed by the conjugation property in the context of complex sequences. Participants engage in a technical examination of the z-transform definition and its implications for complex signals, with a focus on understanding errors in initial attempts at applying the property.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the conjugation property as x^*[n] \stackrel{Z}{\leftrightarrow} X^*(z^*) and attempts to derive it from the z-transform definition.
  • Another participant questions their approach and seeks clarification on the derivation of the conjugation property.
  • A third participant introduces a fact about the product of complex numbers and suggests applying it to the z-transform of the conjugated sequence.
  • One participant provides a detailed derivation, expressing that Z\{x^*[n]\} leads to X^*(z^*) and asks for feedback on their reasoning.
  • Another participant acknowledges the correctness of the derivation but admits to a lack of familiarity with complex signals, indicating a need for further understanding.
  • Further discussion includes the breakdown of the real and imaginary components of the z-transform, with participants expressing confusion about the treatment of these components in their calculations.
  • One participant reflects on their earlier attempts and expresses uncertainty about why their initial reasoning was incorrect, despite following a logical path.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the z-transform of conjugated sequences, with some agreeing on the correctness of certain derivations while others remain uncertain about specific steps and the implications of their calculations. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the initial errors made.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their understanding of complex signals and the nuances of the z-transform, indicating that assumptions about the real and imaginary parts may not have been adequately addressed in their initial attempts.

courteous
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Z-transform of a conjugated sequence ("a straightforward" exercise)

Homework Statement


The conjugation property is expressed as [tex]x^*[n] \stackrel{Z}{\leftrightarrow} X^*(z^*)[/tex]
This property follows in a straightforward maner from the definition of the [itex]z[/itex]-transform, the details of which are left as an exercise.

Homework Equations


Z-transform definition: [tex]X(z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty x[n]z^{-n}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Given a complex sequence, its z-transform is [tex]Z\{x[n]\} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty (x_R[n] + jx_I[n]) z^{-n} = X_R(z) + jX_I(z) = X(z)[/tex]

Hence, the z-transform of a conjugated sequence [tex]Z\{x^*[n]\} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty (x_R[n] - jx_I[n]) z^{-n} = X_R(z) - jX_I(z) = X^*(z)[/tex]

Now, how come I didn't get the [itex]z^*[/itex], as in [itex]X^*(z^*)[/itex]? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


What am I doing wrong in trying to show [itex]x^*[n] \stackrel{Z}{\leftrightarrow} X^*(z^*)[/itex]?
 


Fact: x*y = (xy*)* for any complex numbers x and y.

Apply that to X*(z) = Ʃx*(n)z-n.
 


rude man, thank you for the nudge in the right direction:

[tex]Z\{x^*[n]\} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty x^*[n]z^{-n} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty \left(x[n](z^*)^{-n}\right)^* = \left(\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty x[n](z^*)^{-n}\right)^* = \left(X(z^*)\right)^* = X^*(z^*)[/tex]

Is this correct? If so, what did I do wrong in the first attempt?
 


Yes, that's right.

As for what's wrong with your first try: unfortunately I never had to deal with complex signals so I need to bone up on this stuff more myself. Sorry this is the case.

Maybe this will help: Z(Re{x(n)}) = (1/2){X(z) + X*(z*)} and
Z(Im{x(n)}) = (1/2j){X(z) - X*(z*)}.

So that Z(Re{x(n)} + jZ(Im{x(n)}) = X(z) as required.

Stay tuned, I hope to do more later ...
 


rude man said:
Maybe this will help: Z(Re{x(n)}) = (1/2){X(z) + X*(z*)} and
Z(Im{x(n)}) = (1/2j){X(z) - X*(z*)}.

So that Z(Re{x(n)} + jZ(Im{x(n)}) = X(z) as required.
That's like cat chasing its tail. :) And it also doesn't help shedding light on my 1st, erroneous attempt. Hope you'll find something out; I'll most surely post as well if I find the error.
 


courteous said:
That's like cat chasing its tail. :) And it also doesn't help shedding light on my 1st, erroneous attempt. Hope you'll find something out; I'll most surely post as well if I find the error.

Point is, you have written Z(Re{x(n)}) as though it has no complex part, but it does, unless x(n) is itself real. Same goes for Z(Im{x(n)}) where you just stuck a j in front of another z-transformed function as though it too were real.

Thanks for getting back if you do find the error. I would really like to know.
 


You mean those "R" and "I" indices (as in [itex]X_R[/itex] and [itex]X_I[/itex])? Say [itex]x[n]=\{..., 1-j2, 5+j, ...\}[/itex]. Then, [itex]x_R[n]=\{..., 1, 5, ...\}[/itex], [itex]x_I[n]=\{..., -2, 1, ...\}[/itex], and so [itex]x[n] = x_R[n] + jx_I[n][/itex] ... also, [itex]x^*[n]=\{..., 1+j2, 5-j, ...\}[/itex].

So, [tex]Z\{x[n]\} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty (x_R[n] + jx_I[n]) z^{-n} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty x_R[n] z^{-n} + \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty jx_I[n] z^{-n} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty x_R[n] z^{-n} + j\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty x_I[n] z^{-n} = X_R(z) + jX_I(z) = X(z)[/tex]

Surely this is valid? :)
 


courteous said:
You mean those "R" and "I" indices (as in [itex]X_R[/itex] and [itex]X_I[/itex])? Say [itex]x[n]=\{..., 1-j2, 5+j, ...\}[/itex]. Then, [itex]x_R[n]=\{..., 1, 5, ...\}[/itex], [itex]x_I[n]=\{..., -2, 1, ...\}[/itex], and so [itex]x[n] = x_R[n] + jx_I[n][/itex] ... also, [itex]x^*[n]=\{..., 1+j2, 5-j, ...\}[/itex].

So, [tex]Z\{x[n]\} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty (x_R[n] + jx_I[n]) z^{-n} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty x_R[n] z^{-n} + \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty jx_I[n] z^{-n} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty x_R[n] z^{-n} + j\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty x_I[n] z^{-n} = X_R(z) + jX_I(z) = X(z)[/tex]

Surely this is valid? :)

Apparently not. Andf I don't mind admitting I don't know why it isn't. This math is - pardon the pun - complex.

From what I suggested before:

Z{x*[n]} = Z{Re(x[n])} - jZ{Im(x[n])} which I know you agree with.

= (1/2){X(z) + X*(z*)} - (j/2j){X(z) - X*(z*)} which I got from a table of Z transforms.
=X*(z*) QED

I'm afraid I've exhausted my reservoir of knowledge in this situation. Again, my apologies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K