A Zebra chased by Crocodile problem for 16y exam

  • Thread starter Thread starter eldrick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around a controversial exam problem involving a zebra chased by a crocodile, which caused significant distress among students. Participants question the requirement to solve the problem without using calculus, arguing that students aged 17 and 18 are expected to understand differentiation, which is essential for finding maxima or minima. Many agree that differentiation is part of the math curriculum, making the no-calculus requirement puzzling. The thread concludes with the original poster closing the discussion to prevent further time-wasting. The debate highlights the disconnect between exam expectations and students' mathematical knowledge.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
eldrick said:
Solve

8 (b)

without Calculus...
Why without calculus? 17 and 18 year olds studying maths would generally be expected to at least know how to differentiate, and that the derivative will be zero at a maximum or minimum, which is all that's required here. Further, the comments below the article seem to agree that differentiation was part of the curriculum.
 
  • Like
Likes billy_joule
andrewkirk said:
Why without calculus? 17 and 18 year olds studying maths would generally be expected to at least know how to differentiate, and that the derivative will be zero at a maximum or minimum, which is all that's required here. Further, the comments below the article seem to agree that differentiation was part of the curriculum.

eh ?

so you can't solve it without Calc

don't waste my time...
 
eldrick said:
don't waste my time.
OK, in order to avoid the risk of accidentally wasting your time with any future responses, I have closed the thread.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu, weirdoguy, Mentallic and 4 others
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
489
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K