Zero Integrals: The Theory Behind Evaluating Expressions

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of a closed integral equating to zero, questioning whether this necessitates that the integrand itself is zero. It is clarified that while a closed loop integral can be zero, this does not universally imply the integrand must also be zero, as demonstrated by conservative forces. Additional conditions are necessary for the integrand to be identically zero, such as in the case of the Euler-Lagrange equations, where an arbitrary function leads to the conclusion that the integrand must be zero. The conversation emphasizes that if an integrand is the product of an arbitrary function and another function, the latter must be zero for the integral to equal zero. Overall, the relationship between closed integrals and their integrands requires careful consideration of specific conditions.
hasanhabibul
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
what is the theory behind ...if close integral of a expression is zero..then the expression is itself zero
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean that if we have an integral whose path is a closed loop that is equal to zero then the integrand must be zero? If that is so then we cannot say that it is true in general, there need to be addtional conditions. For example, the integral of a conservative force over a closed loop will be zero but the integrand, the force, does not necessarily need to be zero itself over the integration path.

I cannot remember all of the exact conditions where it follows that the integrand has to be identically zero. One example is the Euler-Lagrange equations, in their derivation we can come to the point where,

\int_0^1 F(x)\eta(x)dx = 0

Here, the function \eta(x) is any arbitrary function that enforces the boundary conditions \eta(0)=\eta(1)=0. Since \eta(x) is arbitrary between the endpoints of the path then we conclude that the integrand, F(x), must be identically zero. This is not the exact case that you requested since it is not a closed path but one could extend the same thinking to a closed path.

That is, if we have an integrand that is the product of two functions, one that is an arbitrary function, then for the integral to be zero the the non-arbitrary function must be zero over the entire integration path. Thus, the integrand itself must be zero.
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
8K