Zero-point energy of diatomic hydrogen (particle in a box)

Mayhem
Messages
406
Reaction score
306
Homework Statement
Can the zero-point energy of diatomic hydrogen be calculated as a sum of the zero-point energies of all particles in the system?
Relevant Equations
##E_1 = h^2/8mL^2##
If we take ##H_2## as a "particle" in a box, can the zero-point energy of the overall molecule be calculated as the sum of the zero-point energies of all particles in ##H_2##?

That is $$E_ {1,H_2}=\frac{2h^2}{8m_{\mathrm{H^+}}L^2} + \frac{2h^2}{8m_{\mathrm{e^-}}L^2}= \frac{h^2}{4L^2}(1/m_{\mathrm{H^+}}+1/m_{\mathrm{e^-}})$$

My reasoning being that in our "ideal" box, the system is isolated, and thus energy must be conserved.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One hydrogen molecule, two protons and two electrons system, has its ground state for chemical bond.
Say hydrogen molecules are in a box, since they are Bose particles, all remain in the ground state for molecule motion.
The ground state energy of hydrogen molecules in a box seems to be decomposed like that.
 
You may want to consider the "ortho-para" equilibrium for "ground state" calculations.
 
Bystander said:
You may want to consider the "ortho-para" equilibrium for "ground state" calculations.
Explain?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top