Treadmill Physics: Understanding Incline & Work Done

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TimR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of treadmill incline and its effect on the work done by the user. Participants explore the relationship between incline, energy expenditure, and potential energy, considering both running and cycling scenarios on a treadmill.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Tim expresses confusion about how treadmill incline affects work done, questioning the relevance of potential energy when there is no actual change in height.
  • One participant suggests that while running, the user does change height with each step, which contributes to the difficulty and energy expenditure, thus justifying the inclusion of gravitational potential energy in equations.
  • Another participant argues that if cycling on a treadmill, the situation differs, as one would need to exert force to remain stationary on an incline, indicating that energy is still required even without vertical displacement.
  • A further point is made about the extreme case of a vertical treadmill, where the user must apply force against their weight, similar to treading water, suggesting that work is done and energy is dissipated through a braking mechanism or could be converted to electricity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are multiple competing views regarding the role of incline in energy expenditure and the mechanics of treadmill operation.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the mechanics of treadmills and the nature of work done are not fully explored, such as the specifics of energy transfer and the role of treadmill design in these scenarios.

TimR
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ok, I think I've confused myself. :-S

How can the incline of a treadmill have any affect on the work done? Surely as there is no actual change in height, there is no change in potential energy and so no significant amount of extra work is done. Why then do treadmills even allow you to change the incline and why have I found equations that involve the supposed change in height? Do you see why i am confused?

Thanks

-Tim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An excellent question! It's easy to see where the confusion arises.

When you're on a treadmill, you are changing your height. Every step you take forwards, you essentially also take upwards, depending on the elevation of the treadmill. The fact that you're (quickly) returned to where you started is irrelevant. This means that a steeper setting will indeed be more difficult, and explains why a gravitational potential term is included in your energy equations.

If, instead of running, you were cycling on the treadmill (and actually could stay in the same place) then the above would not apply.

Let us know if you don't understand, my explanations have been a bit off lately!

Ooh, and also, welcome.
 
brewnog said:
If, instead of running, you were cycling on the treadmill (and actually could stay in the same place) then the above would not apply.
No, consider what the situation would be like if the treadmill were stopped: the bike would roll down backwards. It takes a force on the pedals to keep the bike stationary in a stopped treadmill, and therefore extra energy when it is moving.

Likewise with the running - you can stay exactly in the same place and still use more energy: since the treadmill is falling away from you, you have to push harder to stay in the same place.
 
TimR said:
How can the incline of a treadmill have any affect on the work done?
Or consider the extreme case where the treadmill is vertical. Then it's like a ladder, which as you climb, is lowered so you stay in the same place. You definitely have to apply a force of your own weight, and with arms and legs moving while applying this force, you definitely do work. Where does this energy appear? It is in the brake mechanism that allows the ladder to descend while you remain in place. It is similar to treading water while swimming: you stay in place, but definitely do work; that work appears and is dissipated in the water. Similarly, getting back to the treadmill, you will find that there is something, a brake of some kind, that is built into the mechanism that takes up the energy. Instead of a brake, you could hook up a generator and have your work turned into electricity.
 
russ_watters said:
No, consider what the situation would be like if the treadmill were stopped: the bike would roll down backwards. It takes a force on the pedals to keep the bike stationary in a stopped treadmill, and therefore extra energy when it is moving.

Russ 1, brewnog 0. Thanks for that. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
16K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K