Recent content by Kajagoogooooooo

I tried to read the article you attached, but found hard time to understand it as you said. Thanks for the reference anyway. Is the reference that was mentioned is related to the equation you mentioned?

I understand your point. My problem is that one might say that we don`t need a model beyond the SM because it is good enough. I want a proof that the numbers we get from the SM are not sufficient in order to explain the ratio I`ve mentioned above.

The standard model fulfills all Sakharov conditions, the problem is that the CP violation is too small. My problem is as mfb said is to find the equation through which you will be able to compare the CP violation to the ratio mentioned above. Am I right? @mfb

This formula is exactly what I lack, otherwise, we can`t really say the CP violation in the Cronin-Fitch experiment is too low without comparing it to the eta ratio of (baryon-antibaryon)/photons. Where the photons are those from the CMB. Thanks again!

The ratio of baryon-antibaryon to photon is around 10^-10. The CP violation we have seen (1 to 500 in Cronin and Fitch experiment) is not enough to explain this ratio, But I'm not sure, what the ratio had to be so we will be able to explain it with this amount of CP violation? Or in other words...

What I understood about the AD from the article it that is generated from the Super Symmetry Theory, which means that we take every boson`s superpartner (bosonino) or the superpartner of the fermion (sfermion) and by inflation fields from CP violation (don't know what it is) we cause the...

Thanks a lot! Just one more thing, I have read that there are mechanisms that generate the asymmetry directly from the baryons like Affleck-Dine baryogenesis. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/14/12/125013 This article was the best I found from a quick search but there are too...

and a left-handed lepton doublet as you have said, are particles that do interact in my model, and as a result, I cannot define them by having a mass (Majorana neither Dirac)?

Can you try to explain this so B.S. degree graduate would understand? I`ve tried reading about this on the net, but found a hard time understanding what is it: Dirac mass, SM singlets and what it has to do with vev results? On what articles or models do you base those statements? any references?

I`ve spent some time reading about the baryon asymmetry and the Sakharov`s conditions, and there some things I didn't exactly get: 1. Interactions out of thermal equilibrium: isn't it trivial? our universe is expanding so, of course, it out of equilibrium. 2. CP violation: I`ve read that Cronin...

Leptogenesis as the Origin of Matter Buchmuller Peccei and Yanagida

from an article written by yanagida and peccei. I can put a link if you wish.

I heard about some who believe the answer lies in the lepton sector or in the neutrino sector, can you expand on this issue?

As I have read you need to satisfy Sakharov conditions in order to make matter-antimatter asymmetry: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/24042/baryon-asymmetry 1. CP violation has been approved in the Cronin and Fitch experiment. 2. Interactions out of thermal equilibrium - Our universe...

I don't understand why CP violation is insufficient to explain the observed baryon asymmetry? in every article I find it says: "we know its insufficient..." without an explanation. I will be glad for an explanation and for articles that deal with this issue. And how do you solve it using the...