Statics - Confusion about forces direction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding sign conventions in mechanics, particularly when analyzing forces and moments in a system with supports allowing rotation. The user initially struggles with determining the signs for Ay and By, realizing that choosing the same sign for both leads to different results than if they were opposite. They acknowledge that while signs indicate direction, the algebra can clarify the correct values regardless of initial assumptions. Ultimately, the user discovers that their earlier confusion stemmed from a mistake in their calculations, leading to a trivial result of 0 = 0. They plan to reformulate their question for further clarification in a dedicated homework section.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
This is NOT a homework question. Just trying to understand a basic concept about signs convention...
[PLAIN]http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/9334/spring62009.jpg

Support A and B allow rotation, but nothing else.

Now, if I know W = 400 [N] for instance, using sum of all moments on B and sum of all forces on X I can find Bx = 920 and Ax = 920. It's easy for me to know which sign to use since there's only 1 force in each equation.

Here comes the kicker, though. I need to find Ay and By. I got two equations and two unknowns.
Sum of all moments on W, and sum of all forces on Y axis.
But, if I write Ay and By with the same signs (both plus or both minuses) they'd end up a different result if they had different signs (one plus the other a minus). My lecturer always told us that the sign of the result will let us know whether the original sign we picked was correct. But, when I have two equations and two unknowns, if I get a sign wrong it makes a different result!

So, am I suppose to intuitively know Ay and By are opposite signs because of some mechanically principle of rotation, or is there a way to mathmatically verify it through the equations?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't matter what direction you choose. If you "guess" the wrong direction, the magnitude of the force willl come out as a negative number.

In complicated problems it is often easiest just to say that all forces as positive in the positive X and positive Y directions, and let the algebra sort out the minus signs for you.

Work through the question making different assumptions and you will see how the equations change when you sum the forces and moments, and how the answers change when you solve the equations.
 
Sorry it took me A WHILE to reply. I was meaning to get back to that. It's just that I'm still confused.

Yes, I do understand the idea that minus and plus are about direction. But reviewing my question, I made a mistake, and as it turns out, the terms cancel each other out and I get 0 = 0!

I want to rephrase the question so I'm making another topic in HW section, because I want to go over this specific question and this specific equations. Thanks though.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3249340#post3249340
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top