Gyroscopes-Specific Questions by an interested High Schooler

  • Thread starter Thread starter Styker7
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding gyroscopes, particularly the differences between a bicycle wheel gyroscope and a mechanical gyroscope. The bicycle wheel's unmoving point is likened to the center point of a mechanical gyroscope, while the rope acts as a gimbal. Precession in both types of gyroscopes occurs due to the torque applied by gravity, causing the gyroscope to rotate at right angles to the applied force. A common misconception is that gyroscopes resist rotation; instead, they rotate orthogonally to the applied torque. The conversation highlights the complexities of gyroscopic motion and the principles of physics that govern their behavior.
Styker7
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Recently I've become fascinated with Gyroscopes and how they work. I am a high-schooler that only has a small physics background so any "dumb downed" answers would be appreciated.

First, I rigged up a bicycle wheel gyroscope (in which i hung a bicycle wheel from a rope and twisted the wheel to watch it turn in a circle about the rope). What I don't understand is how this example of a gyroscope pertains to a mechanical gyroscope. In the mechanical gyroscope the unmoving point is the center piece.
But what is the unmoving point in the bicycle wheel? (An analogy as an answer would be very helpful for me here. I.E. Bicycle Wheel=Center point; Rope=Gimbal)
How does a mechanical gyroscope show precession?
How is it that a mechanical gyroscope is amazing? I assumed that because it is not fixed to any of the gimbals it does not need to move in the direction that they are moving.
Also, pertaining to the bicycle wheel gyroscope; I understand that precession is caused by Newton's first law which, when implied, means that since the bicycle wheel can not progress in a straight forward motion it must proceed in a circular fashion. Is this correct?
How is it that precession cancels out the gravitational force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure that I understand any of your questions exactly enough to answer them, but let me explain a common misunderstanding about gyroscopes.
Most people think that a gyroscope resists having its axis rotated. That's not quite correct. In reality, if you try to rotate the axis one way, the gyroscope will happily rotate its axis, but at right angles to both the axis and the applied torque. If holding it in your hand you naturally resist this tendency for it to move in a way other than you intended, and what you feel back is, in a sense, your own resistance.
However, mounted in gimbals you can observe the orthogonal compliance quite easily.

With your bicycle wheel, I'm unclear how you attached it to the rope. If you tied the rope to the spindle then the wheel would be free to turn without twisting the rope. In this arrangement, you could hold the wheel tilted at an angle to the horizontal and give it a good spin, about the spindle, directly. You should then see the wheel precess around the rope.
Gravity is exerting a torque at right angles to both the spindle and the rope. This results in a rotation at right angles to both this and the spindle, i.e. around the diameter of the wheel at greatest angle to the horizontal. But as soon as it starts to move that way, the torques change too, and the end result is precession around the vertical axis.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top