Amplitude Modulation equation help

AI Thread Summary
Amplitude modulation in sound synthesis involves using one frequency to modulate the amplitude of another, resulting in a carrier frequency and two additional signals known as the sum and difference frequencies. The equation for this process is presented, but the user seeks assistance in applying it to specific data pairs to calculate instantaneous amplitude. Suggestions include using a spreadsheet to input constants and time values, allowing for easier calculations without needing to solve trigonometric problems directly. A correction is noted regarding an equation from a referenced source, emphasizing the use of the original equation for clarity. The discussion concludes with a positive response to the advice given.
dmorr
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

I am trying to understand the phenomena behind the technique of using amplitude modulation in sound synthesis. When you have two frequencies, for example, w1=200hz and w2=300hz, and you use the amplitude of one (w1) to modulate the amplitude of the other (w2), it creates 3 signals, one of which is the original carrier frequency, plus 2 others which are called the "sum" and "difference".

you can read more about it here:

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/mar00/articles/synthsecrets.htm

Anyways, to get the point here... the equation to explain this looks like this:


A1= a1cos(w1t)) + 1/2 [a2cos(w1+w2)t] + 1/2[a2cos(w1-w2)t]

so "1" is the carrier and "2" is the modulator frequency

A= instantaneous amplitude
a= maximum amplitude possible (just using an arbitrary unit here)
w= frequency
t= time


It's probably a basic trigonometry equation, but I haven't done trig since high school, and it's all a blur. What my goal is is to compare two sets of outcomes of data going through this equation. I just don't know how to do the math, so if someone could help me plug in these pairs of data into the equation, that would be awesome.

I want to compare the outcome of this carrier and modulator pair with another.

1. FIRST PAIR>> carrier: a1 = 100, w1= 100hz, t=3 seconds (also arbitrary)
modulator: a2 = 50, w2= 1hz, t =3

2. SECOND PAIR>> carrier: a1 = 100, w1= 100hz, t=3 seconds (also arbitrary)
modulator: a2 = 50, w2= 80hz, t =3

I would like to see what the instantaneous amplitude of the carriers would be in each cases, ideally it would be better if someone could just explain to me how to do the math, and then I could do a bunch of calculation myself.

Thank you so much if someone is able to help me.

dylan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you drop these formulae into a spreadsheet and graph the result?
Btw, Eqn 4 at the link you provided is wrong. It's OK in Eqn 5.
 
haruspex said:
Why don't you drop these formulae into a spreadsheet and graph the result?

Because I don't know how to solve trigonometry problems. So even though I have the data and the equation, I am not able to plug in numbers into it and find the instantaneous amplitude of the carrier.

Since you were able to recognize that the equation in the link was wrong haruspex would you be able to put one of my pairs of data into the equation and show your work so I can do the rest on a spreadsheet graph myself?

cheers,

dmorr
 
I don't understand why you think you have to solve any trig.
Create cells for the constants, a1, aq2, w1, w2.
Create a column for time, the first being 0, the rest being "above cell + .01".
Put the formula in the next column, and away you go.

Btw, you don't need to use eqn 5. You can use the original eqn:
(a1 + a2.cos(w2.t)).cos(w1.t)
The point of eqn 5 is to reveal certain properties.
 
sweet, i will do that. thanks!
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top