How to Graph y = 9/x² Without a Calculator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Integral0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
AI Thread Summary
To graph the equation y = 9/x² without a calculator, one can analyze its properties: the graph is symmetric about the x-axis, has a vertical asymptote at the y-axis, and approaches the x-axis as x increases. By rewriting the equation as y = 9 * (1/x²), it can be related to the graph of y = 9 * x², which is a parabola. Reflecting this parabola about the y-axis helps visualize the graph of y = 9/x², resulting in a "U" shape with points like (-1, 1/9) and (1, 1/9). Additionally, replacing x with y and y with x yields the equation x = 9/y², effectively reflecting the graph through the line y = x. Understanding these transformations aids in accurately sketching the graph without direct point plotting.
Integral0
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
(1) How do you graph the equation y = 9 divided by x^2 w/o using a calculator and besides plotting points?

(2) If you replace x with y and y with x, can you reflect the equation 9/x^2 ?

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't graph an equation (other than a linear equation) exactly without plotting individual points.

You can get a pretty good approximation by noting that, since x2 is always positive, y= 9/x2 is above the y-axis and symmetric about the x axis. Of course, for x close to 0, y will be very large: the y-axis is a vertical asymptote. For x very large, y is close to 0: the x-axis is a horizontal asymptote.

(2) If you replace x with y and y with x, can you reflect the equation 9/x^2 ?

I presume you mean changing y= 9/x2 into x= 9/y2. Yes, that will "reflect" the graph through the line y= x.
 


(1) To graph the equation y = 9 divided by x^2 without using a calculator and besides plotting points, we can use the rules of transformations. The equation y = 9 divided by x^2 can be rewritten as y = 9 * (1/x^2). This allows us to see that the graph will be a reflection of the graph of y = 9 * x^2 about the y-axis.

To graph y = 9 * x^2, we can start with a basic parabola with its vertex at (0,0) and points on either side such as (-1,9) and (1,9). Then, we can reflect these points about the y-axis to get the corresponding points for y = 9 divided by x^2. This will give us a graph that looks like a sideways "U" with its vertex at (0,0) and points on either side such as (-1,1/9) and (1,1/9).

(2) Yes, if we replace x with y and y with x, we can reflect the equation 9/x^2. The resulting equation would be x = 9/y^2. This is because when we reflect a graph about the line y = x, the x and y coordinates switch places. So, the graph of y = 9/x^2 would be the same as the graph of x = 9/y^2, just rotated 90 degrees counterclockwise.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top