Convert flat space function to curved space function?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of transforming functions defined in flat spaces to curved spaces, particularly the concept of "equivalent functions." It highlights that points in curved spaces differ from those in flat spaces, complicating the transformation process. The Riemann Sphere and Mobius Transformations are mentioned as examples that provide visual insights into these transformations. Key questions include how functions relate to the curvature of the space and whether they can be expressed in flat space coordinates. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of metrics in defining functions and their behavior in different geometries.
friend
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
9
Is there a general procedure to convert or transform a function that is defined on a flat space into an equivalent function in curves spaces?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "equivalent function" ? Since the points on the curved space will be different from the points in the flat space, unless the curved space is just extrinsically curved or is just a portion of a curved space homeomorphic to the flat space.
 
Last edited:
friend said:
Is there a general procedure to convert or transform a function that is defined on a flat space into an equivalent function in curves spaces?

How about the Riemann Sphere and Mobius Transformations...

http://www.sciencemag.org/sciext/vis2007/show/"

The movie in slide #8 of the link provides an excellent visual representation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
slider142 said:
What do you mean by "equivalent function" ? Since the points on the curved space will be different from the points in the flat space, unless the curved space is just extrinsically curved or is just a portion of a curved space homeomorphic to the flat space.

I guess that's my question. How does a point know if it is in flat space or curved space? And therefore, how does a function know if it is in flat or curved space? Can a function on curved space be expressed in terms of the curvature of that space at each point? And can this be converted to some function on flat space coordinates?
 
Your function doesn't care about the metric of the space, be it flat or curved. As I understand it, the function is defined on the set of points making up the space,and is therefore unaffected by a change of the metric.
 
Pere Callahan said:
Your function doesn't care about the metric of the space, be it flat or curved. As I understand it, the function is defined on the set of points making up the space,and is therefore unaffected by a change of the metric.

What if the function is the metric? I suppose if the function depends on two points, or is it the distance between two points, then it depends on the curvature of the space. Is this right? What about differential changes in the function? That differential depends on the metric, right? So a Taylor expansion used to represent the function WOULD depend on the metric. I guess the question still remains for me. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top