Can the equation x! + (x-3)! = 16x - 24 be solved for x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alesak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorials
AI Thread Summary
The equation x! + (x-3)! = 16x - 24 is theoretically interesting but does not have integer solutions. For x greater than 2, the left side grows faster than the right side, indicating no equality can be achieved for integer values. Numerical methods reveal four real solutions between 1 and 4.5, specifically x1=1.1837, x2=1.3134, x3=2.1222, and x4=4.4099, along with five negative solutions, none of which are integers. The Gamma function analysis confirms that while there are multiple solutions for negative values, they do not yield exact integers.
Alesak
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
hello everyone,
I usually post my questions on one small czech mathematical forum, but here is an equation no one knows how to "solve". I`ve came to it by accident, when I made an mistake in one combinatorics equation.


x! + (x-3)! = 16x - 24

its fairly simple to solve in one way(x has to be greater than 2, and from some point left side is greater than right side, because (x-3)! is always greater then 0 and we don`t have to care about -24 on the right side, so we can check for which x is x! > 16x. this leaves us only very few possibilities for x to check).

this is nice, but I`d like to know if its possible to get it in form x = something. I can`t think of any way how to do it.

also, this equation doesn`t have any solution, its rather theoretical question.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If x can be a real number (using Gamma function) you can find 4 solutions betweeen 1 and 4.5 (by plotting method or std numeric method).
x1=1.1837
x2=1.3134
x3=2.1222
x4=4.4099
There are also 5 negative solution... None is integer.
 
It is simple to check that there is no integer solution. Factorials increase far more rapidly than a linear function, more rapidly than exponentials even. We know x>2. For x=4, the LHS is smaller than the RHS, for x=5 it is larger, thus there is no integer x where they are equal.
 
I have also tried this in several different ways, I got:

x! = ( 8x (x-2) (x-1) (x-1.5) )/( x (x-1) ( x-2) +1 )

which means no integer values...

Is this really all?
 
Plotting the function (remebering x!=Gamma(x+1))
G(x)=Gamma(x + 1) + Gamma(x - 2) - 16x + 24
you can see that for x>0 there are only four zeros.
For x<0 there are infinite solutions near 0,-1,-2,-3...none exacly integer.
There Gamma function is singular (has a pole) and change sign.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
22K
Back
Top