How Does the Ellipse Equation Relate to the Pythagorean Theorem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jacksonpeeble
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept ellipses
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explains the relationship between the ellipse equation and the Pythagorean theorem through the geometric properties of ellipses. The equation c² = a² - b² describes the relationship between the distances from the foci to the vertices and co-vertices of the ellipse. It highlights that an ellipse is defined by the constant sum of distances from two foci, which can be visualized using right triangles formed by the coordinates of the foci and points on the ellipse. The Pythagorean theorem is applied to derive the distances involved, confirming the connection between these mathematical concepts. Understanding this relationship enhances comprehension of conic sections and their properties.
jacksonpeeble
Gold Member
Messages
118
Reaction score
2
In class today, my instructor went over conic sections and ellipses (and hyperbolas, although that's irrelevant). We pretty much learned the basics - foci, semi-major and semi-minor axes, etc.

However, the equation c²= a² − b² where c is the distance from the focus to vertex and b is the distance from the vertex a co-vetex on the minor axis sort of confused me. It sounds a lot like the Pythagorean Theorem. Could someone please explain why this formula is true (graphically)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You'll have a greater handle on conic sections by deriving the Cartesian coordinate equations yourself from their geometric definitions. If you're feeling adventurous, you can try the intersection of a plane with two cones. Otherwise, try these:
1) A circle is the set of all points equidistant from a single point. Suppose this point is given the Cartesian coordinate (h, k). If (x, y) is a point on the circle, what equation must x, y, h, and k satisfy? Note that since the circle is defined by distance, the definition of Euclidean distance, the Pythagorean equation, will be necessary.
2) An ellipse is the set of all points (x, y) such that the sum of the distances from two particular points (called focii) in the plane is a constant L. This is like attaching two thumbtacks to a sheet of paper and attaching a string of length L between them, then using a pencil to draw the shape that always keeps the string taut.
3) A parabola is the set of all points in the plane equidistant from a particular point, called the focus, and a line, called the directrix (the distance between a point and a line is taken as the minimum distance). You can also try to get it as the shape from which all lines perpendicular to the directrix are reflected by the curve out through the focus.
You will find all of these curves and the hyperbola recurring many times in physical phenomena, so their properties should be second nature.
 
An ellipse has the "defining" property that there are two points, the foci, such that the total distance from one focus to any point on the ellipse to the other focus is a constant.

Suppose the foci are at (-c, 0) and (c, 0) and the ellipse crosses the x-axis at (a, 0). Going from (-c, 0) to (a, 0) is a distance of (a+ c): from the focus to the origin is c and from the origin to the ellipse is a. Now back to the focus is a distance of a- c: we only go back to (c, 0), not to the orgin or (-c, 0). The (constant) total distance is (a+c)+ (a- c)= 2a.

Now suppose the ellipse crosses the y-axis at (0, b). The total distance from (-c,0) to (0,b ) to (c,0) is the sum of two hypotenuses or right triangles: the first with vertices (-c,0), (0,0) and (0,b), the other with vertices (c, 0), (0, 0), and (0,b).

That's where the Pythagorean theorem comes in! The distance from (-c,0) to (0, b) is \sqrt{c^2+ b^2} and the distance from (0, b) to (c, 0) is the same. Since that total distance is a constant, we have \sqrt{c^2+ b^2}= a or, after squaring, c^2+ b^2= a^2 and c^2= b^2- a^2.
 
Thanks!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top