Infinite Variance VS Zero Variance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concepts of zero variance and infinite variance distributions in Information Theory. The Dirac delta function represents a zero variance process, while the opposite concept, a distribution with infinite variance, is explored. It is noted that a distribution can have a mean and still possess infinite variance, as exemplified by Brownian motion, which is unpredictable yet has a defined mean. The conversation also touches on the complexities of defining a "most probable" value in distributions where all values are equally probable. Ultimately, the nuances of variance and mean in statistical distributions are highlighted, emphasizing the interplay between chaos and order in these mathematical concepts.
cacosomoza
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi there, this is caco, I´m a new user from planet Earth.

I´m studying Information Theory and lately It seems that I live in a fractal ocean of gaussian distributions...

I do know that zero variance processes relate to Dirac´s delta distribution, my favourite mathematical artifact ever. And then I considered the opposite case, a distribution in which its mean is all possible values at the same time. It would be somewhat like that its mean is its own domain (despite we are not talking of a function in the strict sense).

Anyway, I don´t want to become too philosophical but I always loved the opposition between chaos and order and i think the presence of a mean is the presence of some intrinsic order within that process. We know the universe tends to set energy equiprobably around physical space, which would mean that the universe tends to an infinite variance distribution.

My question is, does it have any name such process, a totally chaotic and unpredictible process? Which is the opposite of the dirac delta function?

Thanks for your words
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
cacosomoza said:
Hi there, this is caco, I´m a new user from planet Earth.

I´m studying Information Theory and lately It seems that I live in a fractal ocean of gaussian distributions...

I do know that zero variance processes relate to Dirac´s delta distribution, my favourite mathematical artifact ever. And then I considered the opposite case, a distribution in which its mean is all possible values at the same time. It would be somewhat like that its mean is its own domain (despite we are not talking of a function in the strict sense).

Anyway, I don´t want to become too philosophical but I always loved the opposition between chaos and order and i think the presence of a mean is the presence of some intrinsic order within that process. We know the universe tends to set energy equiprobably around physical space, which would mean that the universe tends to an infinite variance distribution.

My question is, does it have any name such process, a totally chaotic and unpredictible process? Which is the opposite of the dirac delta function?

Thanks for your words

If what you mean by opposite is Fourier transform then the Dirac delta transforms to the uniform distribution.

The universe will not tend to an infinite variance distribution because its volume is finite. Also it is not clear that it will ever reach a uniform energy distribution. It that were inevitable then how did it get wound up in the first place?

A distribution can have a mean and still have infinite variance.

A distribution without a mean is usually not studied and does not really relate to any theory I know except in degenerate cases such as particles of definite momentum or position in Quantum Mechanics.

A Brownian motion is totally unpredictable even though it has a definite mean.

The only continuous stochastic process with independent increments is a Brownian motion.
 
Last edited:
wofsy said:
A distribution can have a mean and still have infinite variance.

Thanks for your answer. How is it possible that if all values are equally probable one may be selected as representing the most probable? Can somebody explain me this?

Thanks
 
cacosomoza said:
wofsy said:
A distribution can have a mean and still have infinite variance.

Thanks for your answer. How is it possible that if all values are equally probable one may be selected as representing the most probable? Can somebody explain me this?

Thanks

? What do you mean - if all values have equal probability - how can one be most probable?
 
The mean doesn't have to be the most probable value.

I'm not quite getting what you mean by infinite variance: usually if a distribution has a moment that is not finite we say it doesn't exist. As an (artificial) example, consider the random variable who's density is

<br /> f(x) = K \cdot \left(\frac 1 {x^3}\right), \quad x \ge 1<br />

Here K is the constant needed to make

<br /> \int f(x) \, dx = 1<br />

This has a finite mean, since x f(x) is of the order x^{-2}, and so the required integral converges. However, the variance doesn't exist, since x^2 f(x) is of order x^{-1}, and the required integral does not converge.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top