Why Is the Upward Force from Support P Not Matching My Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The upward force from support P must equal the total weight of the two masses hanging from the bar, which is 16N, contrary to the initial calculation of 6N. The confusion arose from incorrectly applying torque calculations when the problem only required balancing forces. The torque on each side of the bar is equal, keeping it horizontal, but the upward force at the midpoint is simply the sum of the weights. The position of the masses affects torque but not the normal force as long as the bar remains balanced. Therefore, the normal force is determined solely by the combined weight of the two masses.
slain4ever
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a bar AB of no mass and 1m length is balanced on a support P at its midpoint. 0.6kg is hung on one end and 1kg is hung 0.3m away from the mid point on the other side. What is the upward force from support P

Homework Equations



torque = perpendicular force * radius

The Attempt at a Solution



i thought it would be simple. i figured out the force on one side was 3N and the other side was the same. So 3N + 3N both acting down is 6 N since the bar isn't moving down it must be being pushed from the support with a force of 6N. However the answer in my book is 16N i don't understand how it can possibly be this.
Please show me where i went wrong.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I place a 1kg box on a table, what is the normal force exerted by the table on the box? Does this force depend on how the mass is distributed within the box? Going back to your problem, would it matter if both weights were placed at the midpoint of the bar?
 
so your saying i just add up the two forces 10 + 6=16N ? That's the correct answer but why wouldn't i need to use force * radius?

I think it does matter if they are placed away from the midpoint
 
Actually i think i may understand this. Because the torque on each side is equal the bar remains horizontal, so the force of each is directly down and counteracting the rotation caused by the other mass.
 
Well the problem as you've stated it is just asking for the upward force from the support which is touching the bar at the midpoint. Which is just the weight of the two masses correct? There is no calculation of torque needed to solve this problem. Now you're correct about the net torque on the bar depending on where the masses are placed since the equation for torque involves the radius from the pivot. So if the torque on each side wasn't balanced the bar would rotate. But as it is, they are balanced in this problem and the net torque on the bar is zero. This would also be true if the two masses were placed at the midpoint of the bar where the support P is, since the force due to their combined weight would be acting on the pivot, in which case they would not contribute to the torque on the bar and the net torque would again be zero. Either way as long as the bar doesn't fall off the pivot, which could correspond to a number of combinations of where the two masses are placed, then the normal force is just equal to the weight of the two masses; regardless of their position.
 
thank you for your prompt help
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top