Forces on a Book: Scale Reads 3 & 6 - How Can This Be?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mechanic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the forces acting on a book placed on scales in different scenarios involving rockets. In the first scenario, the book on a stationary scale reads 3 due to equal and opposite forces acting on it. In the second scenario, an identical scale on a rocket accelerating at g also reads 3, as the book experiences the same force. However, when two rockets are placed nose-to-nose, the scale reads 6, raising questions about the forces at play. The key point is that the mass of the rockets and their acceleration must be considered, as they affect the forces acting on the scales and the readings observed.
Mechanic
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
1.1 A weight scale is placed on a table on Earth, and a book of mass m is placed on the scale.
1.2 A force of magnitude mg is exerted on the book.
1.3 An equal and opposite force is exerted on the book by the table.
1.4 The book does not accelerate because there are equal and opposite forces of magnitude mg acting on it.
1.5 The scale is calibrated such that it reads 3 on the dial.

2.1 An identical weight scale is placed on the flattened nose of a rocket R1 throttled to accelerate through flat space at a magnitude of g and an identical book is placed on the scale.
2.2 A force of magnitude mg is exerted on the book
2.3 The book accelerates due to the application of the force from the rocket
2.4 The scale, being identical to the one on the table, reads 3

3.1 A rocket, R2, is identical to R1 and is also throttled such that it will accelerate at a magnitude of g when an identical scale and book are placed on its nose.
3.2 Remove any scale or book from the nose of R2, but leave the scale and book on R1, and place the two rockets nose-to-nose.
3.3 The book does not accelerate because there are equal and opposite forces of magnitude mg acting on it.
3.4 The scale reads 6.

In section 1 equal and opposite forces of magnitude mg cause the scale to read 3, but in section 3 equal and opposite forces of magnitude mg cause the scale to read 6. How can this be? Which of the numbered items above is incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3.3 and 3.4 are incorrect: in reality, you have no idea whatsoever what the thrust of the rocket is. The scale could read 10,000,0000 for all the information you have tells you. You're ignoring the mass of the rocket.
 
I went out into flat empty space and set the rocket throttles such that the acceleration of the books on the rocket noses was measured to be g. The mass of the book is m, so the force accelerating the book is mg, regardless of the mass of the rockets. Is this what you disagree with? I’m sure you’ve heard of the man in the rocket that is accelerating at g who cannot tell whether he is in such a rocket or on the surface of the Earth. That is the case regardless of what the mass and/or thrust of the rocket is – just as long as the acceleration is g. Are you saying that by arranging the rockets to be nose-to-nose the magnitude of the forces on the books change even though the throttles are set as described above?
Thanks
 
Mechanic said:
I went out into flat empty space and set the rocket throttles such that the acceleration of the books on the rocket noses was measured to be g.
Yes...
The mass of the book is m, so the force accelerating the book is mg, regardless of the mass of the rockets.
Correct.
Is this what you disagree with?
No. What you're missing is that the rockets are also accelerating at g, so the force applied to them is m(rocket)g. And then when you put two rockets nose to nose, you aren't just stopping the acceleration of the books, you are also stopping the acceleration of the rocket.

Consider this real-world example: The space shuttle. The space shuttle has a takeoff mass of almost exactly 2 million kg. The thrust at takeoff is:
Boosters: 12.5 million N each (2)
Main Engines: 5.4 million N total

That's an acceleration of: 1.55 g. Minus the 1g of gravity means that at takeoff the space shuttle accelerates at 0.55g.

So if you set your scale and book on top of it, it would read about 1.5N

But right before the shuttle lifts off, it is held down by explosive bolts. Alternately, you could just put a big object on top holding it down, similar to your nose-to-nose rockets. These bolts or this object pushing down on it must absorbe .55g*M(rocket), or about 11 million N of force.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top