Understand Ehv DC Transmission: I2R Losses Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter asad1111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dc Transmission
AI Thread Summary
I^2R losses are similar for both AC and DC transmission, with higher voltages reducing these losses due to lower current requirements. While series losses are comparable, AC systems face greater shunt losses due to lossy dielectrics, making DC more efficient at high voltages. The use of DC allows for cheaper insulators and lighter tower construction since it avoids the peak voltage issues of AC. Additionally, DC transmission can facilitate power transfer between regions with different electrical standards. Overall, the discussion highlights the advantages of DC in specific high-voltage applications.
asad1111
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
i have read that in high voltage transmission line dc is preffered on ac and i know all advantages and disadvantages but one main disadvantage that i cannot find was I^2*R losses which was the main reason why we use ac on the first place can someone please explain that?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
asad1111 said:
i have read that in high voltage transmission line dc is preffered on ac and i know all advantages and disadvantages but one main disadvantage that i cannot find was I^2*R losses which was the main reason why we use ac on the first place can someone please explain that?

You're mistaken, I^2*R losses are much the same for both AC and DC. Reducing I^2R losses is the reason for going to higher voltages in either case (both AC and DC).

I^2R losses are "series" losses. These losses decrease with the use of higher voltage due to the fact that you need less current for the same amount of power.

It's parallel losses that increase with with increasing voltage, however here there is much asymmetry between the AC and the DC case. This is because the shunt conductance that would cause parallel losses are typically not simple conductances, but rather are lossy dielectrics. Like a lossy capacitor this is an AC phenomenon. So the shunt losses are far greater for AC than they are for DC, that's the real advantage of DC at extremely high voltages.
 
Last edited:
For a given transmission line, if the DC current and the RMS current are the same, then the heat dissipation of the line will be the same for DC or AC.

So, this sets an upper limit on how much current the line can carry.

The voltage drop also depends on this current and the resistance of the wires.

Using a higher voltage (AC or DC) results in more total power being delivered and better efficiency.

Developing this higher voltage, and using it at the consumer end of the line, is currently easier using AC and transformers, but DC has some advantages, particularly if the transfer of power is between countries that use different electrical standards for domestic power supply.
 
The transmission line can use cheaper insulators because there's no AC peak voltage in DC - 1000 kv is 1000kv not 1414kv.

By using Earth for return they reduce # of wires and insulators , so the towers can be of lighter construction.
 
jim hardy said:
The transmission line can use cheaper insulators because there's no AC peak voltage in DC - 1000 kv is 1000kv not 1414kv.

By using Earth for return they reduce # of wires and insulators , so the towers can be of lighter construction.

In my country, AC transmission does not use the Earth as a conductor. It is used for safety reasons, but does not normally carry a current.

There used to be some single wire transmission systems in remote areas, but these have been phased out for reasons of safety and reliability.
 
""In my country, AC transmission does not use the Earth as a conductor. It is used for safety reasons, but does not normally carry a current.""

same here. i was describing hvdc which in its real early days used Earth for return. i assume it still does.

sorry about the confusion.

one wonders whether that Earth return would make HVDC more vulnerable to those solar flare induced magnetic storms discussed in another thread... sure increases the area available for induction.
 
Last edited:
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top