Resolution of F vs t measurement

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring the resolution of frequency in resonance frequency measurements using a Laser-Doppler vibrometer. It highlights that standard deviation may not be an accurate measure due to its limitations with noise types, suggesting the Allan deviation as a more reliable method for determining frequency resolution. The Allan deviation should be calculated as a function of integration time, with the minimum value taken as the resolution. Resources such as the NIST handbook of frequency analysis and free Matlab routines for Allan deviation calculation are recommended. Accurate frequency measurement is crucial for reliable data analysis in resonator studies.
Excom
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hi all

I have measured the resonance frequency of a resonator as a function of time by mean of a Laser-Doppler vibrometer and a frequency counter. In this measurement there are some fluctuations in the measured frequency as time goes by.
My question is: How do I determine the resolution of this frequency measurement? Or in another way: How precise can I resolve the frequency? Do I take the standard deviation for a period and then define this as my frequency resolution?

I hope someone can help me.

Best regards
Excom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That would be the RMS error. A pretty universal way of stating errors - I say go for it.
 
Thanks:-)
 
A more correct way of doing it is to calculate the Allan deviation as a function of integration time and then take the minimum value.
 
Indeed. the standard deviation is not a good measure in these situations. The reason is that it only converges for white noise, for all other noise types the STD will give you the "wrong" result which is why the Allen deviation should always be used for this type of analysis.

Have a look at the NIST handbook of frequency analysis (free download). Also, there are free Matlab routines for calculating the ADEV available on Mathworks file exchange.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top