As for the three body problem (the formula used, and the related areas)

AI Thread Summary
Newton's Gravitation Law can be expressed in two formulas for the n-body problem: the first involves the third power of the distance in the denominator, while the second uses the square of the distance. The first formula is preferred as it accounts for vector direction, making it suitable for three-dimensional space. When the distance between two bodies is zero, the force is undefined, which complicates the application of these formulas. Textbooks that focus on algebraic methods and symmetries in gravitational problems are recommended, alongside academic papers for deeper exploration. The discussion highlights the importance of vector notation in gravitational equations and the need for clarity in mathematical formulations.
julypraise
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Could you let me know which formula is Newton's Gravitation Law used for the three body or n body problem in general?

Suppose there are n objects with the masses m_{j}, j=1,2,3,\dots,n and the displacement functions \mathbf{x}_{j}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^{3} with initial conditions of \mathbf{x}_{j}(0),\dot{\mathbf{x}}_{j}(0). Then is the formula

(1) m_{j}\ddot{\mathbf{x}}_{j}=G\sum_{i\neq j}\frac{m_{i}m_{j}(\mathbf{x}_{i}-\mathbf{x}_{j})}{\left|\mathbf{x}_{i}-\mathbf{x}_{j}\right|^{3}}

used, or

(2) m_{j}\ddot{\mathbf{x}}_{j}=G\sum_{i\neq j}\frac{m_{i}m_{j}}{\left|\mathbf{x}_{i}-\mathbf{x}_{j}\right|^{2}}

used?

If the trend is to use (1), then why is it? And what is the trend in defining the formula of Newton's Gravitation Law when \left|\mathbf{x}_{i}-\mathbf{x}_{j}\right|=0?

And is there any textbook (kind graduate or undergraudate textbook level) that teaches this area not by analytical method but by algebraic method, especially focusing on the concept of symmetries? Or should I just find papers to study this area in such a view?

And could you let me know the (mathematical) areas (specifically the names of the areas) that are closely related to this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(2) is limited to one-dimensional cases and for \left|\mathbf{x}_{i}-\mathbf{x}_{j}\right|=0 there is no force
 
julypraise said:
Could you let me know which formula is Newton's Gravitation Law used for the three body or n body problem in general?

Suppose there are n objects with the masses m_{j}, j=1,2,3,\dots,n and the displacement functions \mathbf{x}_{j}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^{3} with initial conditions of \mathbf{x}_{j}(0),\dot{\mathbf{x}}_{j}(0). Then is the formula

(1) m_{j}\ddot{\mathbf{x}}_{j}=G\sum_{i\neq j}\frac{m_{i}m_{j}(\mathbf{x}_{i}-\mathbf{x}_{j})}{\left|\mathbf{x}_{i}-\mathbf{x}_{j}\right|^{3}}

used, or

(2) m_{j}\ddot{\mathbf{x}}_{j}=G\sum_{i\neq j}\frac{m_{i}m_{j}}{\left|\mathbf{x}_{i}-\mathbf{x}_{j}\right|^{2}}

used?

If the trend is to use (1), then why is it? And what is the trend in defining the formula of Newton's Gravitation Law when \left|\mathbf{x}_{i}-\mathbf{x}_{j}\right|=0?

And is there any textbook (kind graduate or undergraudate textbook level) that teaches this area not by analytical method but by algebraic method, especially focusing on the concept of symmetries? Or should I just find papers to study this area in such a view?

And could you let me know the (mathematical) areas (specifically the names of the areas) that are closely related to this problem?

in formula 2, something is missing ( a unit vector along xi-xj) because the summation must be a vector. If you correct it, both formulae become the same becaues the unit vector = (xi-xj)/|xi-xj|
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top