Gas liquid contact in stripping column

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mathematical derivation of a formula related to gas-liquid contact in a stripping column. The initial equation (1) is presented, and the user seeks clarification on how to transition to the final result (2). Another participant suggests a correction to the formula, indicating that the denominator should be adjusted to reflect the correct summation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper notation in LaTeX for clarity. The thread highlights the collaborative effort to solve a technical problem in chemical engineering.
RAfAEL_SP
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
\frac{x[Ain]-x[Aout][/SUB][/SUB]}{x[Ain]-x[out][/SUB][/SUB]}=\frac{\sum s^{K}-1}{\sum s^K} (1)

for k = 0 to n

Final result:

\frac{x[Ain]-x[Aout][/SUB][/SUB]}{x[Ain]-x[/SUB][/SUB]} = \frac{{S-S^{n+1}}}{1-S^{n+1}}

(2)

Does anyone know how to get from (1) to (2).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi RAfAEL_SP! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(use _ not SUB in latex, and use tex rather than itex for fractions that ou don;t want to be too tiny! :wink:)
c said:
\frac{x[Ain]-x[Aout][/SUB][/SUB]}{x[Ain]-x[out][/SUB][/SUB]}=\frac{\sum s^{K}-1}{\sum s^K} (1)

for k = 0 to n

Final result:

\frac{x[Ain]-x[Aout][/SUB][/SUB]}{x[Ain]-x[/SUB][/SUB]} = \frac{{S-S^{n+1}}}{1-S^{n+1}}

(2)

Does anyone know how to get from (1) to (2).

I think you mean \frac{\sum s^{K-1}}{\sum s^K}
Then eg the denominator is (∑sK)/(1 - S) :wink:
 
The exponent is just k
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...

Similar threads

Back
Top