Adding Vectors (r, θ, φ) - A Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philosophaie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
AI Thread Summary
To add two vectors in spherical coordinates (r1, θ1, φ1) and (r2, θ2, φ2), the recommended method is to convert them to rectangular coordinates (x, y, z), perform the addition, and then convert back to spherical coordinates. For a more complex approach without using components, one can visualize the vectors as line segments originating from the origin, creating a triangle with known lengths and angles. The lengths of the sides can be determined using the sine and cosine laws. However, calculating the angle between the two sides presents a challenge. This method provides a geometric interpretation of vector addition in spherical coordinates.
Philosophaie
Messages
456
Reaction score
0
How do you add two vectors:

Code:
(r1, theta1, phi1) + (r2, theta2, phi2)

I know if you break them down into x, y, z components you get the right answer but how do you add these vectors.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
As you said, transform them to rectangular coordinates (xyz-components), add them, and then transform back to spherical coordinates.
 
If you mean "without using components" (i.e. the hard way) you use trigonometry.

Draw a line segment with one end at (0, 0, 0) in the direction given by theta1 and phi1 with length r1. At its tip, draw a second line segment in the direction given by theta2 and phi2 with length r2. Finally, draw the line segment from (0, 0, 0) to the tip of the second line segment. This forms a triangle in which you know the length of two sides and the angle between them so can use the sine and cosine laws to determine the length and angles of the third side. It is determining the angle between the two sides that is complicated.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top