What is the Nature of Matter: Electron & Fundamental Particles

  • Thread starter Thread starter jodavwel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter Nature
AI Thread Summary
Electrons and other fundamental particles, such as protons and neutrons, are considered indivisible, with electrons being classified as fundamental because they lack substructure. Protons and neutrons are composed of three quarks each, while the nature of electrons remains elusive, as they cannot be broken down further. Quantum Field Theory (QFT) posits that particles are excitations of underlying fields, making their fundamental composition unknowable. The discussion also touches on alternative theories like wave structure of matter and string theory, which suggest different foundational elements of reality. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexity of understanding matter at its most basic level.
jodavwel
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What is an electron made of and, what are other so called fundamental particles made of?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are not made of anything else - that's why they are called fundamental.
 
This the second question that dipped into "the nature of the universe"

Phy I , quarks... wtitten to be the fundamental unit mathmatically proven.

my answer to my professor: Their is probably life growing on it.

lately, I've been going with: the sum of all energy is equal to zero...

if you ever fall off that log, in that direction, you can alway get a job selling "Man can't know anything" or get out of physics.
 
The proton and the neutron are each composed of three quarks. The electron is not composed of anything smaller.
 
The electron is a fundamental particle i.e. it has no constituents. What it is made of, I think, can't be answered generally in any theory. In QFT particles are excitations of an underlying field, certain properties can be measured but what it is made of is basically unknowable.
 
What about the wave structure of matter theory? See dr. Milo wolff and others, e.g. William clifford, a. Einstein, e. Schrodinger. Why did the majority of the physics community adopt the particle theory of n. Bohr?
 
According to string theory: everything is made of vibrating strings.
 
jodavwel said:
What about the wave structure of matter theory? See dr. Milo wolff and others, e.g. William clifford, a. Einstein, e. Schrodinger. Why did the majority of the physics community adopt the particle theory of n. Bohr?
"Particles with wave-like properties" is the usual way to view these objects.
They are fundamental particles as they cannot be split into smaller parts, and their propagation can be described with equations for waves.
 
Back
Top