Can you figure this out!?

quasar987

The "rigorous" proof should follow from an analysis of the equations [itex]F_1=ma_1[/itex] and [itex]F_2=ma_2[/itex]. What is [itex]a_2[/itex] in terms of [itex]a_1[/itex] if you set [itex]F_2=2F_1[/itex]?

quasar987 Recognitions: Gold Member Homework Help Science Advisor	The "rigorous" proof should follow from an analysis of the equations [itex]F_1=ma_1[/itex] and [itex]F_2=ma_2[/itex]. What is [itex]a_2[/itex] in terms of [itex]a_1[/itex] if you set [itex]F_2=2F_1[/itex]?