What is the meaning of the y-axis on a sine wave graph?

AI Thread Summary
The y-axis on a sine wave graph represents the amplitude of the sine function, which corresponds to the y-coordinate of a point on the unit circle at a given angle. When evaluating sin(pi), the result is 0, indicating the sine value at that angle. The x-axis denotes the independent variable, typically in radians, while the y-axis reflects the function's output. It is noted that the visual representation of sine waves often exaggerates the y-axis scale for aesthetic purposes, which can affect interpretations of slope and derivatives. Understanding these aspects is crucial for accurate analysis of sine functions and their graphical representations.
PhotonW/mass
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Okay this has been bothering me, I know what the x-axis on sine graph mean, but not the y axis. I know when I type for example: sin(pi) I will get 1. But what is that 1? I know its the y cordnate. But what is it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's the amplitude of the sine wave.

Since the sine function is related to a unit circle, think of the amplitude as the y coordinate on the unit circle when the radius makes an angle theta to the positive x-axis.
 
Sine(pi) equals zero. Geometrically the sine of angle α equals the length of the opposite side divided by the length of the hypotenuse in a right triangle. The particular size of the triangle is unrelevant as long as it contains the angle. In an unit circle centered at the origin sine(α) equals the distance of a point on the circumference (at angle α) from the x-axis. It corresponds to the imaginary part of e^(iα) in complex analysis.
 
Last edited:
PhotonW/mass said:
Okay this has been bothering me, I know what the x-axis on sine graph mean, but not the y axis. I know when I type for example: sin(pi) I will get 1. But what is that 1? I know its the y cordnate. But what is it?
I am wondering what you think the x-axis "means" and what kind meaning you want the y-axis to have. The only "meaning" the x-axis in any graph has is the values of x, the independent variable. And the only "meaning" the y-axis has is the value of y the function assigns to the corresponding x.

And, by the way, "sin(pi)" is 0, not 1.
 
In plotting the function sin(x) where x is in radians, the scale of on the y-axis is traditionally larger than the scale on the x-axis to make the picture look nicer (more "wavy"). So the length from 0 to 1 on the y-axis is longer than the length of 0 to 1 on the x axis. If you wanted to draw an "honest" graph, you would make a length of 1 on the y-axis equal to whatever length you chose for 1 radian on the x-axis.

On an exaggerated graph, if you try to measure the slope of the tangent line to the graph of sin(x) in terms of the angle it makes with the x-axis, you'll get the wrong answer since you won't be using the same scale in both the vertical and horizontal directions. (This line of thinking also shows why the derivative of the function sin(x) where x is in degrees is a different than derivative of sin(x) where x is in radians.)

Exaggeration of vertical scales for an artistic effect is common. For example in most "realistic" computer renderings of terrain ( on Earth or on other planets) the vertical scale in the picture is exaggerated. As another example, books for artists teach that the human figure is "7 heads" tall, but statistically this is an exaggeration. (People who draw fashion drawings for clothing advertisements are taught to draw figures that are 8 or 9 heads tall!)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top