Classical spin system. Ising model.

AI Thread Summary
The energy function ##E=-S_1S_2## indicates that when spins are aligned parallel, the energy becomes negative. This negative energy arises from the choice of reference level, which in this case is set to zero for the spin system. Similar to gravitational potential energy, where reference levels can vary, the energy in spin systems can also be adjusted by shifting the reference point. By introducing a constant, the energy can be expressed as ##E=const-JS_1S_2##, allowing for flexibility in interpretation. Ultimately, understanding energy in this context requires recognizing the importance of reference levels.
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Energy function ##E=-S_1S_2##. I took ##J=1##. If spin are oriented parallel energy is negative. How could energy be negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy scales are often relative. The reference level in the spin system is set to zero.

It's similar to how when talking about gravitational potential energy (close to earth) we typically set our reference energy level to ground level, so that energies are positive. However, when talking about gravitational potential energies between planets, etc., we often chose our reference level to be at infinite separations, so that the energy is negative.

However, we can always shift these energies by a constant energy level (equivalent to shifting our reference level).
 
If I understand you well you can always put ##E=const-JS_1S_2##. I just sometimes say ##const=0##.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top