Radioactive Decay: Proper Use and Amount of Occurrence?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the proper definition of "radioactive decay," questioning whether it refers to the amount of decay that has already occurred or the rate at which decay happens. The author seeks clarification following a debate with a biology teacher. They express a desire to consolidate the conversation in the original thread to avoid confusion. The author plans to request that moderators lock this thread. The focus remains on understanding the terminology and its implications in educational contexts.
Shellman035
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What is the proper use and meaning of "Radioactive decay"? How much decay HAS occured

This is a second thread to clarify my first thread about a debate with my biology teacher. I went back in an edited the content and title but it still posts under my original title
anyway,,,,


what is the proper use of the term "radioactive decay" is it the amount of deacay that HAS occurred or the "rate of decay as it occurs? for the exact post read my first post about a disagreement with my biology teacher
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this discussion can be had in the original thread. To avoid confusion, I will ask the mods to lock this thread.
 
Done so.

.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top