Photon Kinetic Energy: Wavelength & Frequency

Click For Summary
A photon's energy is determined by its frequency, expressed by the equation E = hf, where h is Planck's constant. This relationship indicates that higher frequency electromagnetic waves, such as 400 GHz, possess greater energy compared to lower frequencies like 20 Hz. The discussion also touches on the application of classical kinetic energy equations to photons, clarifying that E = 1/2mv^2 is not applicable due to photons having zero mass. Instead, the energy-momentum relationship for photons is simplified to E = pc, where p is momentum. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the unique properties of photons in relation to energy and frequency.
nuby
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
How is a photon's energy determine in relation to it's wavelength and frequency?
For example, 20hz vs. 400ghz electromagnetic waves.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nuby said:
How is a photon's energy determine in relation to it's wavelength and frequency?
For example, 20hz vs. 400ghz electromagnetic waves.
The energy of a photon, E (which can be considered as all kinetic energy since the proper energy = E0 = 0 and E = K + E0 = K), is related to the photon's frequency, f, by E = hf where h = Planck's constant = 6.626068 × 10-34m2kg/s.

Pete
 
can E=1/2mv^2 be applied to photons ever?
or E=mc^2
 
The proper relativistic equation is
:E^2 = p^2c^2 + m^2 c^4, which works just fine for photons when m = 0.

For ordinary particles, one can Taylor expand E = \sqrt{p^2c^2 + m^2 c^4} to get a non-relativistic equation most people use... but for photons, you can't do this, and E = pc simply.

According to de Broglie, p = h \nu, of course.
 
nuby said:
can E=1/2mv^2 be applied to photons ever?
or E=mc^2
No.

Pete
 
Einstein said, when describing someone falling off a building, that the Earth accelerating up to meet him/her. Without the Earth getting larger in all directions as the paradox goes, it curvature of space-time which is why you can have the acceleration up without the surface moving up as you follow a geodesic path. Any deviation from that geodesic will requires a force which is what causes you to have weight on a scale on earth. However, what if we consider an orbiting satellite which is...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
6K