Register to reply

A problem about nxn Matrix

by universedrill
Tags: matrix
Share this thread:
universedrill
#1
Dec5-08, 08:03 PM
P: 3
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
1) Prove that: nxn real matrix A is a root of f(X)= a[n].X^n+...+a[0].I, where a[n],...,a[0] are coefficients of the polynomial P(t)= det [A-t.I]
2) Let 5x5 real matrix A be satisfied: A^2008 = 0. Prove that: A^5=0.

2. The attempt at a solution
I tried to solve problem 2 with an general idea: nxn matrix A: A^m=0 (m>n). Prove: A^n=0.
Let P(t)=det [A-t.I]. So, deg P(t)=n, t is a real number.
Let t is a root of P(t), we get:
det[A-tI]=0 -> the equation: (A-tI)X=0 has a root X which is different from 0
-> AX = tIX=tX -> A(AX)=A(tX)
->A^2.X=t(AX)=t(tX)=t^2.X ->..... -> A^m.X=t^m.X
Because X differ from 0 and A^m =0, we find out t^m =0 -> t=0
Thus, P(t)= t^n.
Now, the important thing is proving problem 1. I remember that the problem 1 seem to be a theorem? Can you help me prove that, or find meterials saying that? Thanks
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
Defennder
#2
Dec5-08, 09:11 PM
HW Helper
P: 2,616
1) In other words, they are asking for a proof of the Cayley-Hamilton theorem? That I believe should be rather difficult, since proof of this theorem was omitted when I took my intermediate linear algebra course this semester.

2) Use result 1 to prove it. Instead of evaluating det(A-tI), what is det(A^2008 -tI) ?

P.S. Use of square brackets [ ] can be confusing. Use the normal parantheses instead.
universedrill
#3
Dec5-08, 09:26 PM
P: 3
Thanks, but
Quote Quote by Defennder View Post
2) Instead of evaluating det(A-tI), what is det(A^2008 -tI) ?
I don't understand clearly what you mean.
And, is there any solution where theorem 1 isn't used for problem 2?

Defennder
#4
Dec5-08, 09:58 PM
HW Helper
P: 2,616
A problem about nxn Matrix

Well, it appears that the problem has been set up in such a way such that you can use the result of theorem 1 (even if you do not know how to prove it) to do 2). And I don't know which part of what I wrote you do not understand. What don't you understand about finding det(A^2008 -tI) ?
gabbagabbahey
#5
Dec5-08, 10:19 PM
HW Helper
gabbagabbahey's Avatar
P: 5,003
There are a few different methods to prove (1). Have you studied adjugate matrices yet? If so, can you reason that [itex]\text{adj} (A-tI_n)[/itex] exists? If so, what can you say about [itex](A-tI_n) \cdot \text{adj} (A-tI_n)[/itex]?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Matrix problem Precalculus Mathematics Homework 9
Matrix problem Precalculus Mathematics Homework 1
Matrix problem Advanced Physics Homework 0
Matrix Ax = b Problem Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Matrix problem General Math 3