Average acceleration from acceleration vs time graph

AI Thread Summary
To find average acceleration from an acceleration vs. time graph, calculate the overall change in velocity by determining the area under the curve between the specified time intervals. This area represents the integral of acceleration over time, with positive areas added and negative areas subtracted. Average acceleration can be visualized as a rectangle with a height that equates to the calculated area divided by the time interval. Without knowing the initial velocity, only the change in velocity can be determined, not the exact final velocity. Thus, while the graph provides insights into changes, it does not reveal the starting point of the velocity.
swirly90
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have a few question regarding Acceleration, I am not sure exactly how to get average acceleration from a acceleration vs. time graph. Do you make a slope? I drew a sample graph, say get the average acceleration from 11s - 25s? Would you try to draw a slope between the two time intervals?

2pu0d93.jpg



How do you find velocity on a graph like this? Is the area from the line to the zero line?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


(Instantaneous) acceleration is the quotient of some tiny change in velocity divided by the tiny time interval during which the change occurs. Average acceleration is the quotient of some overall change in velocity divided by the overall time interval during which the change occurs. So, if you have this plot of (instantaneous) acceleration in time, the first thing to do is to figure out the overall change in velocity. Then, divid this by the time interval. The change in velocity is the "area under the curve". That is, the change in velocity is the integral of the acceleration over time. If the curve is negative, subtract the area. If the curve is positive, add the area.
 


The average acceleration can be represented as a rectangle of fixed height on this graph. The base of the rectangle is from zero to 35 s. The height of the rectangle should be such that the area of the rectangle (base*height) is the same as the area under the graph that is given. So the first step is to find the area under the graph above. This would be the sum of two positive and one negative areas.
 


swirly90 said:
How do you find velocity on a graph like this? Is the area from the line to the zero line?



Without knowing the initial velocity, you can't technically know the velocity of the object. What you CAN know is the overall change in velocity, which as kuruman explained is adding / subtracting the area under the curve depending on whether it's positive/negative.


:smile:
 


Thanks, so "under the line" its not velocity but the change in velocity?
 


In some ways, yes - but you don't know where you started initially with the velocity.

In your example graph (assuming the line is zero and each little box is 1 m/s/s high, that scale is a bit off), you'd get:

60 - 48 + 16 = +28 m/s

So you'd be 28 m/s faster than what you started at.

But considering that you could have started at 0 m/s, or 5 m/s, I can't know for sure exactly how fast you're going from that graph, only the overall change.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top