Can Magnets Attract H2O Molecules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mapa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetic
AI Thread Summary
H2O is a polarized molecule with a significant electric dipole moment, but it is not truly magnetic. While water interacts with strong magnetic fields, it is classified as diamagnetic, meaning it has no unpaired electrons and is less magnetic than many substances. The confusion often arises between water and oxygen; O2 is paramagnetic due to its two unpaired electrons. Water's slight magnetic moment is impermanent and results from the arrangement of electrons in its molecular orbitals. Overall, water does not attract magnets due to its lack of permanent magnetic properties.
mapa
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I understand that H2O is polarized. The way I see it there is a north pole and a sole pole. If this is correct, why does it not attract magnets?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the help.
 
H2O is really not truly magnetic. When you say "magnetic" you probably mean "ferromagnetic" or that it has a permanent magnetic moment. Water can't, because there's no "spot" where unpaired electrons could permanently "live".

Water is paramagnetic, which means that it has a slight magnetic moment, because the last two electrons in oxygen's shell are unpaired and each one is in the p_x* and p_y* orbitals. You can measure this in something called a "gouy balance" - same thing w/ O2 gas or O2 liquid. There's a ton of switching around of these electrons (note the "*", meaning they are in special "antibonding" orbitals), so that's why you only get a very mild, impermanent magnetic moment.

Water has a "big" electric dipole moment, however, b/z oxygen is so electronegative, that the bulk of the time the electrons that came along with, and are covalently shared by, the two hydrogens, spend their time around oxygen.

In solids, where lots of unpaired electrons can permanently live in the crystalline unit cells of compounds like cobalt-iron-neodymium or what have you, can and do have very large permanent magnetic moments...all the unpaired electrons EACH occupy a d-orbital...since they're all pointing in one direction (due to Hund's rules and the Aufbau principle), there's your permanent magnetic moment and, hence, ferromagnetism. Does that help?
 
solidspin said:
Water is paramagnetic, which means that it has a slight magnetic moment, because the last two electrons in oxygen's shell are unpaired and each one is in the p_x* and p_y* orbitals.

I'm afraid you've confused water with O2 and atomic orbitals with molecular ones.
Water has no unpaired electrons and is thus diamagnetic. Which, (for the benefit of the original poster), means it's even less magnetic than that - about as un-magnetic as a substance can get.

It's O2 that has two unpaired electrons (in the \pi^*_x and \pi^*_y molecular orbitals), and is thus paramagnetic.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top