
#1
Feb2712, 04:35 AM

P: 61

I am looking at inflation at the moment, and it says in my textbook that (aH)^(1) is constantly increasing in matter or radiation dominated epochs.
a is always positive and always increasing. This tells me that da/dt is positive. I think that setting the universe to MD/RD means that da/dt is decreasing with time (eg a decelerating universe as there is no cosmological constant driving expansion). So dt/da (which is another expression for comoving Hubble radius) is increasing with time. Have I got this right? 



#2
Feb2712, 07:11 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,556

da/dt decreasing in time is not a decelerating universe, it's a contracting one.
EDIT: This statement is obviously incorrect. See below for my efforts to redeem myself... 



#3
Feb2712, 08:38 AM

P: 61

If todays value of da/dt is lower than yesterdays, but they are both greater than 0, doesn't that mean the universe is expanding, but that the rate of expansion is slowing down?




#4
Feb2712, 08:43 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,556

Why does comoving Hubble radius increase with time? 



#5
Feb2712, 02:15 PM

P: 59

Ummm...no one has answered the question correctly so far.
Comoving Coordinates (and Comoving distances) do NOT increase with the expansion of the Universe, and do not increase in time. That is the whole point of the Comoving coordinate system. Proper distances increase in time. The Hubble Paramater is measuring the rate of change of Scale Factor (da/dt) divided by the Scale factor (a). The Scale factor is timedependent, and is directly related to the Proper distance. 



#6
Feb2712, 02:23 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,556

It does not follow that all quantities measured in comoving coordinates are constant  what would be the point of using them then?? Any proper distance that is not increasing with the expansion will have nonconstant comoving coordinates. The Hubble radius, [itex]H^{1}[/itex], measured with respect to comoving coordinates is the comoving Hubble radius, [itex](Ha)^{1}[/itex]. It very much depends on time. 



#7
Feb2712, 02:31 PM

P: 59





#8
Feb2712, 02:36 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,556





#9
Feb2712, 02:44 PM

P: 59

And I agree, I have probably needlessly confused the question in the original post. 



#10
Feb2712, 03:12 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,556





#11
Feb2712, 04:57 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 5,198





#12
Feb2812, 02:21 AM

P: 61

Hooray! Nothing is simple in cosmology, is it? :D



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Calcluating the Hubble Radius for an open universe?  Cosmology  9  
Comoving Hubble radius  Cosmology  2  
Expressing the current Hubble rate as a temporary percentage increase in distance  Cosmology  6  
About Hubble Radius (Radius of the Hubble sphere)  Cosmology  8  
Comoving time rate og change  Classical Physics  2 