Square roots in quadratic trinomial inequalities

AI Thread Summary
In solving the inequality x + 4 < √(-x² - 8x - 12), the approach involves treating the inequality as an equation first. By squaring both sides and simplifying, the critical points are found to be x = -4 ± √2. Testing values around these critical points reveals that the inequality holds true between them. The final solution indicates that x must lie in the interval (-4 - √2, -4 + √2). This method effectively identifies the range of values satisfying the original inequality.
Kartik.
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
How do we treat expressions under a sqaure root in inequalities ? Like for ex.

x+4< Math.sqrt(-x^2-8x-12) (sorry, using m.physicsforums, so i don't know what to use for a root, so JAVA :p)
I request the use of this very example.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So what I like to do is ignore the inequality sign. Treat it as an = sign. Then when I have solutions for the equality I go back and test in the original equation to find the solutions to my inequality.

So for your example.

Square both sides.

(x+4)^2 = -x^2 - 8x -12

Expand

x^2 + 8x + 16 = -x^2 - 8x - 12

Get variables on one side and combine like terms

2x^2 + 16x + 28 = 0

Divide by 2

x^2 + 8x + 14 = 0

Solve

x = (-8 +/- SQRT(64 - 4*1*14) ) / 2*1

x = (-8 +/- SQRT(64 - 56 ) / 2

x = (-8 +/- SQRT(8) / 2

x = (-8 +/- 2*SQRT(2) / 2

x = -4 +/- 1*SQRT(2)

x = -4 +/- SQRT(2)

So now that we have our two solutions we want to treat these as critical points and see what happens between them to find what our solution is.

So I like to test points.

I will test a point greater than both our solutions (0), a point between our two solutinos (-4) and a point less than our two solutions (-10).

For x = 0 we get

0+4< Math.sqrt(-0^2-8*0-12)

4 < SQRT(-12)

This does not solve our inequality.

For x = -4

-4+4< Math.sqrt(-(-4)^2-8(-4)-12)

0 < SQRT(-16 + 32 -12)

0 < SQRT(4)

0 < 2

Success!

For x = (-10)

(-10)+4< Math.sqrt(-(-10)^2-8(-10)-12)

-6 < SQRT(-100 + 80 -12)

-6 < SQRT(-32)

This does not solve our equation.

Now let's just double check our endpoints.

x = -4 +/- SQRT(2)

Remember that this solution is going to make the original equation EQUAL. That means that since we have strictly less than (<) they will not be solutions,

So the solution to the original will be

-4 - SQRT(2) < x < -4 + SQRT(2)

I hope I have helped.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top