New Reply

Intuitively - why aren't black holes hot?

 
Share Thread
Nov18-12, 05:12 AM   #35
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor

Intuitively - why aren't black holes hot?


Quote by enosis_ View Post
Yes, as your first post clarified. Unless I misunderstood the OP - we are concerned with the internal temperature of the black hole - rather than the area surrounding it?
Given that events occuring inside the event horizon are entirely unobservable, is there a point to this line of discussion?
Nov18-12, 09:34 AM   #36
 
Quote by Chronos View Post
Given that events occuring inside the event horizon are entirely unobservable, is there a point to this line of discussion?
No, it seems a bit redundant. The fascinating thing for me - related to the discussion of temperature - is what happens to the heat/energy as it is consumed into the singularity?
Nov18-12, 02:08 PM   #37
 
Quote by enosis_ View Post
No, it seems a bit redundant. The fascinating thing for me - related to the discussion of temperature - is what happens to the heat/energy as it is consumed into the singularity?
The textbook answer is that it's "simply" converted to mass. Keep in mind the singularity isn't a "thing", it's just a word to describe a place where the calculations provided by the theory no longer work.
Nov18-12, 11:44 PM   #38
 
Quote by justsomeguy View Post
The textbook answer is that it's "simply" converted to mass. Keep in mind the singularity isn't a "thing", it's just a word to describe a place where the calculations provided by the theory no longer work.
Perhaps the better question might be is this the original state of the converted energy - or a step closer to it?
Nov19-12, 05:17 PM   #39
 
Quote by justsomeguy View Post
Keep in mind the singularity isn't a "thing", it's just a word to describe a place where the calculations provided by the theory no longer work.
Any theory for gravity based on non scalar mathematics fails at the point of inflection, which is exactly why the author of relativity objected to theories referencing points within the mass radius, once you remove the mass radius from calculations you return to non scalar mathematics, a realm in which only wizards and trolls reside.

Singularities are the problems with mathematical philosophy that physics fails to notice.
Nov19-12, 11:27 PM   #40
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Mathematics is the language of physics. Yes, there are mathematical illusions and situations where our models fail to include, or, properly parameterize all of the relevant variables. But, I disagree there is anything philosphical about mathematics.
Nov24-12, 01:27 AM   #41
 
Quote by Chronos View Post
Mathematics is the language of physics. Yes, there are mathematical illusions and situations where our models fail to include, or, properly parameterize all of the relevant variables. But, I disagree there is anything philosphical about mathematics.
So what exactly is differentiation? or infinity? :)
What happens at points of inflection?, what does a change in sign mean?, and how does it apply to any given model?
Black hole theory is a primary candidate for study, objects accelerate to a near complete halt in a very short time below the point of inflection, which is opposite to what an object does above the point of inflection.
The change in sign has no real meaning in mathematics?
Gravitational models would still work if we ignore the maths below the point of inflection, however would they still work if we ignored the maths above the point of inflection?

Mathematics is a shorthand for ideas expressed in natural languages, the language of physics is natural language, sometimes expressed in shorthand form.
Nov24-12, 02:40 AM   #42
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by codex34 View Post
So what exactly is differentiation? or infinity? :)
What happens at points of inflection?, what does a change in sign mean?, and how does it apply to any given model?
Black hole theory is a primary candidate for study, objects accelerate to a near complete halt in a very short time below the point of inflection, which is opposite to what an object does above the point of inflection.
The change in sign has no real meaning in mathematics?
Gravitational models would still work if we ignore the maths below the point of inflection, however would they still work if we ignored the maths above the point of inflection?

Mathematics is a shorthand for ideas expressed in natural languages, the language of physics is natural language, sometimes expressed in shorthand form.
Differentiation is mathematically rigorous way of expressing an ordered change. The proper way to treat an event horizon is as an indefinite integral. You can't differentiate an indefinite integral in the way you are suggesting.
New Reply

Similar Threads for: Intuitively - why aren't black holes hot?
Thread Forum Replies
Black holes, white holes and expansion of Universe Cosmology 7
black holes, white holes, and time Astrophysics 13
White Holes are time-reversed black holes? General Physics 29
Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes? General Physics 0
Why aren't electrons considered "black holes"? Special & General Relativity 18