Register to reply 
Dissipative Lagrangian 
Share this thread: 
#1
Dec1412, 06:34 AM

P: 152

Hello,
I run across the following Lagrangian, $$\mathcal{L} = m \dot{x}\dot{y} + \frac{1}{2} \gamma (x \dot{y}  \dot{x} y) $$ I can see how a variation with respect to $$ x, y $$ yields the (viscous) equations of motions $$ \ddot{x} + \dot{x} = 0 \quad, \quad \ddot{y}  \dot{y} = 0 $$. In the paper I attach this Lagrangian is described as being the physical Lagrangian for two coupled oscillators, one with negative and the other with positive friction (hence one is exponentially stable, while the other is not, as the equation of motion stress). I do not understand how the lagrangian $$ \mathcal{L}$$ can correspond to two such oscillators. Moreover, the whole idea of the formalism seems to conserve energy, in the sense that the (nondampening) oscillator will absorb all the energy dissipated by the viscous oscillator. But then the two speeds should be in magnitude equal, and not like $$ e^{t}$$ and $$e^{t}$$. I struggle to understand the physical picture, I wounder if anybody could help. Thanks you very much 


#2
Dec1412, 08:25 AM

PF Gold
P: 1,141

The energy here is defined as [tex] E = p_x \dot x + p_y \dot y  L = m \dot x\dot y. [/tex] and since the Lagrangian does not depend on time, it should be constant in time. You can verify this by multiplying the solutions for [itex]\dot x, \dot y[/itex]  the exponentials will cancel out and the result does not depend on time. However, all this seems very artificial  I would like to see some useful application of it. 


#3
Dec1412, 08:50 AM

P: 152

Jano,
many thanks for your response. I am still confused though. 1) Should not the Lagrangian for two harmonic oscillators (with equal mass m) be something like (I have the lingering feeling I am not seeing something obvious) $$ \frac{1}{2}m (e^{2t}+e^{2t}) $$ 2) As you underline, oner h.o. will dampen exponentially, the other one will run away. How is it possible then the energy dissipated in one equals the energy input in the other, as the article states? Thank you ever so much 


#4
Dec1412, 02:55 PM

PF Gold
P: 1,141

Dissipative Lagrangian
No problem muzialis.
If the energy came out as a sum of independent terms, then we could ascribe the terms to subsystems, but in this case, there is just one term, so it makes no sense to speak about the energy of one oscillator. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Dissipative Thermodynamics  Classical Physics  1  
How to know if a system is dissipative?  Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework  1  
2form and dissipative systems  Classical Physics  39  
Dissipative Function of Air Drag  Classical Physics  0  
Dissipative vs. conservative  General Physics  1 