Quantum Entanglement vs. Now Slices (Relativity)

by DrSammyD
Tags: entanglement, quantum, relativity, slices
DrSammyD is offline
Dec16-12, 10:04 PM
P: 21
So I watched this video talking about now slices, and how it seems that across vast distances of space, movement can affect what is actually the now of places far away.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO_Q_f1WgQI">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO_Q_f1WgQI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350">

This seems to be in direct conflict with what I've heard about quantum entanglement.

Let's say we move an entangled particle across such a distance. If we start moving away with our particle at very fast pace, the entangled particle on the other side will be affected in the past, where as if we start moving towards it, it will be affected in the future. But from what I've heard, entangled particles change "simultaneously" without regard to which "now slice" is happening.

Am I describing this correctly? Is anybody researching how these two phenomenon relate?
Phys.Org News Partner Space news on Phys.org
SpaceX launches supplies to space station (Update)
Quest for extraterrestrial life not over, experts say
Sun emits a mid-level solar flare
Chalnoth is offline
Dec17-12, 05:30 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 4,721
There is no such thing as a global "now". Or, perhaps more accurately, there are many perfectly-valid slices of the universe that can be thought of as having equal time values. What's incorrect here is your understanding of quantum entanglement. But that's understandable, as quantum entanglement is a very strange effect that is frequently described incorrectly.

Here's a (hopefully) better way to think about it: quantum entanglement is, fundamentally, about consistency. If we have a quantum-mechanical system that splits into two particles, one whose spin is always opposite the other's, then any measurement of particle A's spin will be opposite of particle B's spin. That is, if I measure spin "up" on my particle A, and particle B travels towards you, then you will necessarily measure spin "down" on particle B. It does not matter if we measure the particles at the same time, or one before the other. The timing is irrelevant. The only thing that is relevant is that the two particles have spins that are consistent.
DrSammyD is offline
Dec18-12, 11:00 PM
P: 21
Can the spin of the particle be measured without knowing what the other particle's spin is?

justsomeguy is offline
Dec19-12, 12:07 AM
P: 166

Quantum Entanglement vs. Now Slices (Relativity)

Quote Quote by DrSammyD View Post
Can the spin of the particle be measured without knowing what the other particle's spin is?
Measuring one tells you the state of both.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
About quantum entanglement and relativity of simultaneity Special & General Relativity 17
Entanglement - Does FTL via entanglement violate causality or relativity? Quantum Physics 22
Quantum entanglement vs relativity of time Quantum Physics 9
Relativity and Quantum Entanglement Quantum Physics 4
Relativity as a Consequence of Quantum Entanglement: Qtm Log. Gate Model (for Fra) Beyond the Standard Model 1